Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Syria

Youth unemployment in Syria in 2025 — 33.1%. Ranked 167 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 20.97 pp.

2025 33.1% +0.33 pp vs 2024
World rank 167of 182
Period maximum 36.29%2020
Period minimum 12.13%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Syria, 1991–202501020304019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 12.13%1992: 12.65%1993: 13.57%1994: 13.7%1995: 13.07%1996: 13.24%1997: 13.5%1998: 13.73%1999: 14.29%2000: 18.24%2001: 21.98%2002: 20.68%2003: 19.43%2004: 18.78%2005: 18.18%2006: 17.65%2007: 18.92%2008: 22.15%2009: 16.32%2010: 20.49%2011: 21.11%2012: 33.81%2013: 35.45%2014: 35.98%2015: 34.81%2016: 33.63%2017: 32.89%2018: 32.41%2019: 32.06%2020: 36.29%2021: 34.65%2022: 31.99%2023: 32.26%2024: 32.77%2025: 33.1%
Change over the period: +20.97 pp Annual average: 0.62 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Syria

Syria 33.1%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
Low-income countries computed 8.88%
Youth unemployment — Syria, by year Syria All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 33.1 +0.33 pp
2024 32.77 +0.51 pp
2023 32.26 +0.27 pp
2022 31.99 −2.66 pp
2021 34.65 −1.64 pp
2020 36.29 +4.23 pp
2019 32.06 −0.36 pp
2018 32.41 −0.48 pp
2017 32.89 −0.75 pp
2016 33.63 −1.17 pp
2015 34.81 −1.17 pp
2014 35.98 +0.53 pp
2013 35.45 +1.64 pp
2012 33.81 +12.7 pp
2011 21.11 +0.61 pp
2010 20.49 +4.18 pp
2009 16.32 −5.83 pp
2008 22.15 +3.23 pp
2007 18.92 +1.28 pp
2006 17.65 −0.53 pp
2005 18.18 −0.6 pp
2004 18.78 −0.66 pp
2003 19.43 −1.25 pp
2002 20.68 −1.3 pp
2001 21.98 +3.75 pp
2000 18.24 +3.94 pp
1999 14.29 +0.57 pp
1998 13.73 +0.23 pp
1997 13.5 +0.25 pp
1996 13.24 +0.17 pp
1995 13.07 −0.63 pp
1994 13.7 +0.13 pp
1993 13.57 +0.92 pp
1992 12.65 +0.52 pp
1991 12.13

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.