Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Cyprus

Youth unemployment in Cyprus in 2025 — 12.71%. Ranked 91 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 6 pp.

2025 12.71% −0.15 pp vs 2024
World rank 91of 182
Period maximum 38.08%2013
Period minimum 4.56%1992

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Cyprus, 1991–202501020304019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 6.71%1992: 4.56%1993: 5.65%1994: 5.38%1995: 4.97%1996: 5.77%1997: 6.17%1998: 5.89%1999: 9.78%2000: 8.9%2001: 7.98%2002: 7.45%2003: 8.61%2004: 10.21%2005: 13.54%2006: 9.87%2007: 9.49%2008: 8.53%2009: 13.28%2010: 15.85%2011: 21.16%2012: 27.24%2013: 38.08%2014: 35.52%2015: 32.54%2016: 28.9%2017: 25.01%2018: 20.65%2019: 16.86%2020: 18.49%2021: 17.17%2022: 18.71%2023: 16.22%2024: 12.86%2025: 12.71%
Change over the period: +6 pp Annual average: 0.18 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Cyprus

Cyprus 12.71%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Cyprus, by year Cyprus All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 12.71 −0.15 pp
2024 12.86 −3.36 pp
2023 16.22 −2.49 pp
2022 18.71 +1.53 pp
2021 17.17 −1.32 pp
2020 18.49 +1.64 pp
2019 16.86 −3.8 pp
2018 20.65 −4.36 pp
2017 25.01 −3.89 pp
2016 28.9 −3.64 pp
2015 32.54 −2.98 pp
2014 35.52 −2.57 pp
2013 38.08 +10.84 pp
2012 27.24 +6.09 pp
2011 21.16 +5.3 pp
2010 15.85 +2.58 pp
2009 13.28 +4.74 pp
2008 8.53 −0.95 pp
2007 9.49 −0.39 pp
2006 9.87 −3.67 pp
2005 13.54 +3.33 pp
2004 10.21 +1.6 pp
2003 8.61 +1.16 pp
2002 7.45 −0.53 pp
2001 7.98 −0.93 pp
2000 8.9 −0.87 pp
1999 9.78 +3.89 pp
1998 5.89 −0.27 pp
1997 6.17 +0.4 pp
1996 5.77 +0.8 pp
1995 4.97 −0.41 pp
1994 5.38 −0.27 pp
1993 5.65 +1.1 pp
1992 4.56 −2.15 pp
1991 6.71

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.