Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Jordan

Youth unemployment in Jordan in 2025 — 38.88%. Ranked 175 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 5.04 pp.

2025 38.88% −0.18 pp vs 2024
World rank 175of 182
Period maximum 43.91%1991
Period minimum 27.61%2014

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Jordan, 1991–2025253035404519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 43.91%1992: 42%1993: 42.22%1994: 37%1995: 32.55%1996: 30.7%1997: 31.08%1998: 31.53%1999: 31.6%2000: 31.65%2001: 33.9%2002: 35.35%2003: 33.29%2004: 34.09%2005: 34.99%2006: 33.02%2007: 31.76%2008: 30.72%2009: 31.37%2010: 30.06%2011: 30.79%2012: 28.85%2013: 29.54%2014: 27.61%2015: 30.91%2016: 35.61%2017: 35.44%2018: 38.94%2019: 37.21%2020: 42.46%2021: 43.86%2022: 42.03%2023: 38.84%2024: 39.05%2025: 38.88%
Change over the period: −5.04 pp Annual average: -0.15 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Jordan

Jordan 38.88%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
Youth unemployment — Jordan, by year Jordan All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 38.88 −0.18 pp
2024 39.05 +0.22 pp
2023 38.84 −3.19 pp
2022 42.03 −1.83 pp
2021 43.86 +1.4 pp
2020 42.46 +5.25 pp
2019 37.21 −1.74 pp
2018 38.94 +3.5 pp
2017 35.44 −0.17 pp
2016 35.61 +4.7 pp
2015 30.91 +3.3 pp
2014 27.61 −1.92 pp
2013 29.54 +0.68 pp
2012 28.85 −1.93 pp
2011 30.79 +0.73 pp
2010 30.06 −1.31 pp
2009 31.37 +0.65 pp
2008 30.72 −1.04 pp
2007 31.76 −1.27 pp
2006 33.02 −1.97 pp
2005 34.99 +0.9 pp
2004 34.09 +0.81 pp
2003 33.29 −2.06 pp
2002 35.35 +1.45 pp
2001 33.9 +2.25 pp
2000 31.65 +0.05 pp
1999 31.6 +0.07 pp
1998 31.53 +0.45 pp
1997 31.08 +0.38 pp
1996 30.7 −1.84 pp
1995 32.55 −4.46 pp
1994 37 −5.22 pp
1993 42.22 +0.22 pp
1992 42 −1.91 pp
1991 43.91

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.