Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Kuwait

Youth unemployment in Kuwait in 2025 — 15.06%. Ranked 108 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 11.81 pp.

2025 15.06% −0.09 pp vs 2024
World rank 108of 182
Period maximum 19.06%2020
Period minimum 2.61%1999

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Kuwait, 1991–20250510152019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 3.25%1992: 3.21%1993: 3.06%1994: 2.91%1995: 2.97%1996: 2.88%1997: 2.75%1998: 2.67%1999: 2.61%2000: 2.99%2001: 2.98%2002: 4.22%2003: 5.22%2004: 7.33%2005: 6.57%2006: 5.86%2007: 6.86%2008: 7.82%2009: 7.24%2010: 8.58%2011: 10.3%2012: 11.99%2013: 13.64%2014: 15.46%2015: 16.18%2016: 15.14%2017: 15.26%2018: 15.22%2019: 15.22%2020: 19.06%2021: 17.76%2022: 15.19%2023: 15.09%2024: 15.15%2025: 15.06%
Change over the period: +11.81 pp Annual average: 0.35 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kuwait

Kuwait 15.06%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Kuwait, by year Kuwait All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 15.06 −0.09 pp
2024 15.15 +0.05 pp
2023 15.09 −0.1 pp
2022 15.19 −2.57 pp
2021 17.76 −1.3 pp
2020 19.06 +3.84 pp
2019 15.22 −0 pp
2018 15.22 −0.03 pp
2017 15.26 +0.11 pp
2016 15.14 −1.04 pp
2015 16.18 +0.72 pp
2014 15.46 +1.83 pp
2013 13.64 +1.64 pp
2012 11.99 +1.7 pp
2011 10.3 +1.71 pp
2010 8.58 +1.34 pp
2009 7.24 −0.58 pp
2008 7.82 +0.96 pp
2007 6.86 +1 pp
2006 5.86 −0.72 pp
2005 6.57 −0.76 pp
2004 7.33 +2.11 pp
2003 5.22 +1 pp
2002 4.22 +1.25 pp
2001 2.98 −0.01 pp
2000 2.99 +0.38 pp
1999 2.61 −0.06 pp
1998 2.67 −0.08 pp
1997 2.75 −0.13 pp
1996 2.88 −0.09 pp
1995 2.97 +0.06 pp
1994 2.91 −0.16 pp
1993 3.06 −0.14 pp
1992 3.21 −0.04 pp
1991 3.25

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.