Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Israel

Youth unemployment in Israel in 2025 — 6.03%. Ranked 34 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 16.07 pp.

2025 6.03% −0.13 pp vs 2024
World rank 34of 182
Period maximum 22.63%1992
Period minimum 5.87%2023

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Israel, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 22.11%1992: 22.63%1993: 20.68%1994: 16.65%1995: 14.91%1996: 13.55%1997: 15.03%1998: 16.94%1999: 16.72%2000: 17.32%2001: 18.7%2002: 20.85%2003: 22.41%2004: 20.66%2005: 17.86%2006: 18.41%2007: 16.25%2008: 12.48%2009: 14.71%2010: 14.22%2011: 11.83%2012: 11.99%2013: 10.4%2014: 10.43%2015: 9.2%2016: 8.51%2017: 7.15%2018: 7.03%2019: 6.53%2020: 7.65%2021: 7.65%2022: 6.72%2023: 5.87%2024: 6.16%2025: 6.03%
Change over the period: −16.07 pp Annual average: -0.47 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Israel

Israel 6.03%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Israel, by year Israel All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.03 −0.13 pp
2024 6.16 +0.29 pp
2023 5.87 −0.85 pp
2022 6.72 −0.93 pp
2021 7.65 +0 pp
2020 7.65 +1.12 pp
2019 6.53 −0.5 pp
2018 7.03 −0.13 pp
2017 7.15 −1.36 pp
2016 8.51 −0.69 pp
2015 9.2 −1.23 pp
2014 10.43 +0.03 pp
2013 10.4 −1.59 pp
2012 11.99 +0.17 pp
2011 11.83 −2.4 pp
2010 14.22 −0.49 pp
2009 14.71 +2.23 pp
2008 12.48 −3.77 pp
2007 16.25 −2.16 pp
2006 18.41 +0.55 pp
2005 17.86 −2.8 pp
2004 20.66 −1.75 pp
2003 22.41 +1.56 pp
2002 20.85 +2.14 pp
2001 18.7 +1.39 pp
2000 17.32 +0.6 pp
1999 16.72 −0.23 pp
1998 16.94 +1.91 pp
1997 15.03 +1.48 pp
1996 13.55 −1.36 pp
1995 14.91 −1.73 pp
1994 16.65 −4.03 pp
1993 20.68 −1.95 pp
1992 22.63 +0.52 pp
1991 22.11

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.