Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Europe & Central Asia

Youth unemployment in Europe & Central Asia in 2025 — 13.99%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 0.89 pp.

2025 13.99% −0.13 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 21.53%1998
Period minimum 13.99%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Europe & Central Asia, 1991–202512141618202219911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 14.88%1992: 15.91%1993: 18.22%1994: 19.59%1995: 20.29%1996: 20.96%1997: 21.23%1998: 21.53%1999: 21.22%2000: 19.63%2001: 18.87%2002: 18.88%2003: 19.1%2004: 19.03%2005: 18.59%2006: 17.67%2007: 15.97%2008: 15.94%2009: 19.84%2010: 19.98%2011: 19.72%2012: 20.55%2013: 20.93%2014: 20.53%2015: 19.94%2016: 19.11%2017: 17.9%2018: 16.83%2019: 16.47%2020: 18.17%2021: 17.53%2022: 15.25%2023: 14.51%2024: 14.12%2025: 13.99%
Change over the period: −0.89 pp Annual average: -0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Europe & Central Asia

Europe & Central Asia 13.99%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Europe & Central Asia, by year Europe & Central Asia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 13.99 −0.13 pp
2024 14.12 −0.4 pp
2023 14.51 −0.73 pp
2022 15.25 −2.28 pp
2021 17.53 −0.64 pp
2020 18.17 +1.7 pp
2019 16.47 −0.36 pp
2018 16.83 −1.07 pp
2017 17.9 −1.21 pp
2016 19.11 −0.83 pp
2015 19.94 −0.59 pp
2014 20.53 −0.4 pp
2013 20.93 +0.37 pp
2012 20.55 +0.83 pp
2011 19.72 −0.26 pp
2010 19.98 +0.14 pp
2009 19.84 +3.9 pp
2008 15.94 −0.03 pp
2007 15.97 −1.7 pp
2006 17.67 −0.92 pp
2005 18.59 −0.44 pp
2004 19.03 −0.07 pp
2003 19.1 +0.22 pp
2002 18.88 +0.01 pp
2001 18.87 −0.76 pp
2000 19.63 −1.59 pp
1999 21.22 −0.32 pp
1998 21.53 +0.31 pp
1997 21.23 +0.27 pp
1996 20.96 +0.67 pp
1995 20.29 +0.7 pp
1994 19.59 +1.37 pp
1993 18.22 +2.32 pp
1992 15.91 +1.03 pp
1991 14.88

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.