Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Low-income countries

Youth unemployment in low-income countries in 2025 — 8.88%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 1.01 pp.

2025 8.88% −0.01 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 10.48%2020
Period minimum 7.87%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Low-income countries, 1991–2025789101119911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 7.87%1992: 7.96%1993: 7.99%1994: 8.01%1995: 7.88%1996: 7.93%1997: 7.97%1998: 8.14%1999: 8.31%2000: 8.49%2001: 8.58%2002: 8.55%2003: 8.51%2004: 8.32%2005: 8.15%2006: 8.24%2007: 8.39%2008: 8.54%2009: 8.35%2010: 8.78%2011: 9%2012: 9.29%2013: 8.92%2014: 8.89%2015: 9.08%2016: 9.26%2017: 9.42%2018: 9.27%2019: 9.23%2020: 10.48%2021: 10.16%2022: 9.3%2023: 9.09%2024: 8.89%2025: 8.88%
Change over the period: +1.01 pp Annual average: 0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Low-income countries

Low-income countries 8.88%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Low-income countries, by year Low-income countries All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 8.88 −0.01 pp
2024 8.89 −0.2 pp
2023 9.09 −0.22 pp
2022 9.3 −0.86 pp
2021 10.16 −0.32 pp
2020 10.48 +1.25 pp
2019 9.23 −0.04 pp
2018 9.27 −0.15 pp
2017 9.42 +0.16 pp
2016 9.26 +0.18 pp
2015 9.08 +0.19 pp
2014 8.89 −0.03 pp
2013 8.92 −0.37 pp
2012 9.29 +0.29 pp
2011 9 +0.22 pp
2010 8.78 +0.43 pp
2009 8.35 −0.19 pp
2008 8.54 +0.15 pp
2007 8.39 +0.15 pp
2006 8.24 +0.1 pp
2005 8.15 −0.17 pp
2004 8.32 −0.19 pp
2003 8.51 −0.04 pp
2002 8.55 −0.03 pp
2001 8.58 +0.08 pp
2000 8.49 +0.18 pp
1999 8.31 +0.17 pp
1998 8.14 +0.17 pp
1997 7.97 +0.04 pp
1996 7.93 +0.05 pp
1995 7.88 −0.13 pp
1994 8.01 +0.02 pp
1993 7.99 +0.03 pp
1992 7.96 +0.09 pp
1991 7.87

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.