Vulnerable employment — all countries

Vulnerable employment — Maldives

Vulnerable employment in the Maldives in 2025 — 16.91%. Ranked 61 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 16.81 pp.

2025 16.91% −0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank 61of 182
Period maximum 33.72%1991
Period minimum 16.91%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of employment

Vulnerable employment — Maldives, 1991–2025152025303519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 33.72%1992: 33.44%1993: 33.2%1994: 32.99%1995: 32.7%1996: 32.42%1997: 32.15%1998: 31.9%1999: 31.67%2000: 31.46%2001: 31.3%2002: 31.13%2003: 30.85%2004: 30.54%2005: 30.41%2006: 30.06%2007: 29.7%2008: 29.25%2009: 28.93%2010: 27.36%2011: 25.68%2012: 23.99%2013: 22.23%2014: 20.44%2015: 20.17%2016: 19.89%2017: 19.5%2018: 19.1%2019: 18.73%2020: 18.33%2021: 17.91%2022: 17.72%2023: 17.48%2024: 17.21%2025: 16.91%
Change over the period: −16.81 pp Annual average: -0.49 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Maldives

Maldives 16.91%
World 42.38%
South Asia 69.74%
Southern Asia computed 67.36%
Vulnerable employment — Maldives, by year Maldives All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 16.91 −0.3 pp
2024 17.21 −0.27 pp
2023 17.48 −0.24 pp
2022 17.72 −0.19 pp
2021 17.91 −0.42 pp
2020 18.33 −0.4 pp
2019 18.73 −0.37 pp
2018 19.1 −0.39 pp
2017 19.5 −0.4 pp
2016 19.89 −0.28 pp
2015 20.17 −0.27 pp
2014 20.44 −1.8 pp
2013 22.23 −1.76 pp
2012 23.99 −1.69 pp
2011 25.68 −1.68 pp
2010 27.36 −1.57 pp
2009 28.93 −0.32 pp
2008 29.25 −0.45 pp
2007 29.7 −0.35 pp
2006 30.06 −0.35 pp
2005 30.41 −0.13 pp
2004 30.54 −0.31 pp
2003 30.85 −0.28 pp
2002 31.13 −0.17 pp
2001 31.3 −0.16 pp
2000 31.46 −0.21 pp
1999 31.67 −0.23 pp
1998 31.9 −0.25 pp
1997 32.15 −0.26 pp
1996 32.42 −0.28 pp
1995 32.7 −0.29 pp
1994 32.99 −0.22 pp
1993 33.2 −0.23 pp
1992 33.44 −0.28 pp
1991 33.72

Southern Asia, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of own-account workers and contributing family workers in total employment. The ILO devised the category as a substitute for informal employment where informality is not measured: such workers usually have no employment contract, no social insurance and no protection against dismissal, and their income depends directly on what they produce. In the poorest countries this share exceeds three quarters of the employed — wage work there is closer to an exception.

Important: Not the same as informal employment: an employee without a contract does not fall into this category, though they are no better protected. The indicator understates informality in countries where off-the-books hiring is widespread.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.