Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Sri Lanka

Safely managed drinking water in Sri Lanka in 2024 — 46.9%. Ranked 112 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 1.7 pp.

2024 46.9% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 112of 148
Period maximum 48.1%2018
Period minimum 45.2%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Sri Lanka, 2000–202445464748492000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 45.2%2001: 45.3%2002: 45.4%2003: 45.5%2004: 45.6%2005: 45.7%2006: 45.9%2007: 46.1%2008: 46.2%2009: 46.4%2010: 46.6%2011: 46.8%2012: 47%2013: 47.2%2014: 47.3%2015: 47.6%2016: 47.8%2017: 48%2018: 48.1%2019: 47.9%2020: 47.6%2021: 47.4%2022: 47.1%2023: 46.8%2024: 46.9%
Change over the period: +1.7 pp Annual average: 0.07 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka 46.9%
World 73.7%
South Asia 77.6%
Southern Asia computed 69.8%
Safely managed drinking water — Sri Lanka, by year Sri Lanka All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 46.9 +0.1 pp
2023 46.8 −0.3 pp
2022 47.1 −0.3 pp
2021 47.4 −0.3 pp
2020 47.6 −0.3 pp
2019 47.9 −0.3 pp
2018 48.1 +0.1 pp
2017 48 +0.2 pp
2016 47.8 +0.2 pp
2015 47.6 +0.2 pp
2014 47.3 +0.2 pp
2013 47.2 +0.2 pp
2012 47 +0.2 pp
2011 46.8 +0.2 pp
2010 46.6 +0.2 pp
2009 46.4 +0.2 pp
2008 46.2 +0.2 pp
2007 46.1 +0.2 pp
2006 45.9 +0.2 pp
2005 45.7 +0.1 pp
2004 45.6 +0.1 pp
2003 45.5 +0.1 pp
2002 45.4 +0.1 pp
2001 45.3 +0.1 pp
2000 45.2

Southern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.