Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — India

Safely managed drinking water in India in 2024 — 76.4%. Ranked 79 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 38.8 pp.

2024 76.4% +1.7 pp vs 2023
World rank 79of 148
Period maximum 76.4%2024
Period minimum 37.6%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — India, 2000–20243040506070802000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 37.6%2001: 39.1%2002: 40.6%2003: 42.1%2004: 43.7%2005: 45.2%2006: 46.8%2007: 48.3%2008: 49.9%2009: 51.5%2010: 53.1%2011: 54.7%2012: 56.3%2013: 57.9%2014: 59.6%2015: 61.2%2016: 62.9%2017: 64.6%2018: 66.2%2019: 67.9%2020: 69.6%2021: 71.3%2022: 73%2023: 74.7%2024: 76.4%
Change over the period: +38.8 pp Annual average: 1.62 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: India

India 76.4%
World 73.7%
South Asia 77.6%
Southern Asia computed 69.8%
Safely managed drinking water — India, by year India All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 76.4 +1.7 pp
2023 74.7 +1.7 pp
2022 73 +1.7 pp
2021 71.3 +1.7 pp
2020 69.6 +1.7 pp
2019 67.9 +1.7 pp
2018 66.2 +1.7 pp
2017 64.6 +1.7 pp
2016 62.9 +1.7 pp
2015 61.2 +1.7 pp
2014 59.6 +1.6 pp
2013 57.9 +1.6 pp
2012 56.3 +1.6 pp
2011 54.7 +1.6 pp
2010 53.1 +1.6 pp
2009 51.5 +1.6 pp
2008 49.9 +1.6 pp
2007 48.3 +1.6 pp
2006 46.8 +1.6 pp
2005 45.2 +1.5 pp
2004 43.7 +1.5 pp
2003 42.1 +1.5 pp
2002 40.6 +1.5 pp
2001 39.1 +1.5 pp
2000 37.6

Southern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.