Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Nepal

Safely managed drinking water in Nepal in 2024 — 16.5%. Ranked 141 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has fallen by 10.3 pp.

2024 16.5% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 141of 148
Period maximum 29.8%2012
Period minimum 16.1%2021

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Nepal, 2000–2024152025302000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 26.8%2001: 27.1%2002: 27.3%2003: 27.6%2004: 27.8%2005: 28.1%2006: 28.4%2007: 28.6%2008: 28.8%2009: 29.1%2010: 29.3%2011: 29.6%2012: 29.8%2013: 28.4%2014: 26.9%2015: 25.5%2016: 24%2017: 22.4%2018: 20.9%2019: 19.3%2020: 17.7%2021: 16.1%2022: 16.2%2023: 16.3%2024: 16.5%
Change over the period: −10.3 pp Annual average: -0.43 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Nepal

Nepal 16.5%
World 73.7%
South Asia 77.6%
Southern Asia computed 69.8%
Safely managed drinking water — Nepal, by year Nepal All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 16.5 +0.1 pp
2023 16.3 +0.1 pp
2022 16.2 +0.1 pp
2021 16.1 −1.6 pp
2020 17.7 −1.6 pp
2019 19.3 −1.6 pp
2018 20.9 −1.6 pp
2017 22.4 −1.5 pp
2016 24 −1.5 pp
2015 25.5 −1.5 pp
2014 26.9 −1.5 pp
2013 28.4 −1.4 pp
2012 29.8 +0.2 pp
2011 29.6 +0.2 pp
2010 29.3 +0.2 pp
2009 29.1 +0.2 pp
2008 28.8 +0.2 pp
2007 28.6 +0.2 pp
2006 28.4 +0.3 pp
2005 28.1 +0.3 pp
2004 27.8 +0.3 pp
2003 27.6 +0.3 pp
2002 27.3 +0.3 pp
2001 27.1 +0.3 pp
2000 26.8

Southern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.