Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Bangladesh

Safely managed drinking water in Bangladesh in 2024 — 59.1%. Ranked 102 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 3.8 pp.

2024 59.1% −0 pp vs 2023
World rank 102of 148
Period maximum 59.2%2022
Period minimum 54.9%2011

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Bangladesh, 2000–2024545658602000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 55.3%2001: 55.3%2002: 55.3%2003: 55.3%2004: 55.2%2005: 55.2%2006: 55.2%2007: 55.1%2008: 55.1%2009: 55%2010: 55%2011: 54.9%2012: 55.3%2013: 55.7%2014: 56%2015: 56.4%2016: 56.8%2017: 57.3%2018: 57.7%2019: 58.2%2020: 58.7%2021: 59.2%2022: 59.2%2023: 59.1%2024: 59.1%
Change over the period: +3.8 pp Annual average: 0.16 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Bangladesh

Bangladesh 59.1%
World 73.7%
South Asia 77.6%
Southern Asia computed 69.8%
Safely managed drinking water — Bangladesh, by year Bangladesh All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 59.1 −0 pp
2023 59.1 −0 pp
2022 59.2 +0 pp
2021 59.2 +0.5 pp
2020 58.7 +0.5 pp
2019 58.2 +0.5 pp
2018 57.7 +0.4 pp
2017 57.3 +0.4 pp
2016 56.8 +0.4 pp
2015 56.4 +0.4 pp
2014 56 +0.4 pp
2013 55.7 +0.4 pp
2012 55.3 +0.3 pp
2011 54.9 −0.1 pp
2010 55 −0 pp
2009 55 −0 pp
2008 55.1 −0 pp
2007 55.1 −0 pp
2006 55.2 −0 pp
2005 55.2 −0 pp
2004 55.2 −0 pp
2003 55.3 −0 pp
2002 55.3 −0 pp
2001 55.3 +0 pp
2000 55.3

Southern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.