Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Bhutan

Safely managed drinking water in Bhutan in 2024 — 65.6%. Ranked 92 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 37.2 pp.

2024 65.6% −1.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 92of 148
Period maximum 67.8%2022
Period minimum 28.4%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Bhutan, 2000–20242030405060702000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 28.4%2001: 28.8%2002: 29.3%2003: 29.7%2004: 30.1%2005: 30.5%2006: 30.8%2007: 31.1%2008: 31.4%2009: 31.8%2010: 32.1%2011: 34.8%2012: 37.6%2013: 40.3%2014: 43.7%2015: 47.1%2016: 50.5%2017: 53.9%2018: 57.3%2019: 60.6%2020: 63.6%2021: 66.6%2022: 67.8%2023: 66.7%2024: 65.6%
Change over the period: +37.2 pp Annual average: 1.55 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Bhutan

Bhutan 65.6%
World 73.7%
South Asia 77.6%
Southern Asia computed 69.8%
Safely managed drinking water — Bhutan, by year Bhutan All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 65.6 −1.1 pp
2023 66.7 −1.1 pp
2022 67.8 +1.2 pp
2021 66.6 +3 pp
2020 63.6 +3 pp
2019 60.6 +3.3 pp
2018 57.3 +3.3 pp
2017 53.9 +3.4 pp
2016 50.5 +3.4 pp
2015 47.1 +3.4 pp
2014 43.7 +3.4 pp
2013 40.3 +2.7 pp
2012 37.6 +2.7 pp
2011 34.8 +2.8 pp
2010 32.1 +0.3 pp
2009 31.8 +0.3 pp
2008 31.4 +0.3 pp
2007 31.1 +0.3 pp
2006 30.8 +0.3 pp
2005 30.5 +0.4 pp
2004 30.1 +0.4 pp
2003 29.7 +0.4 pp
2002 29.3 +0.4 pp
2001 28.8 +0.4 pp
2000 28.4

Southern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.