Labor productivity in Kenya in 2025 — 14,763 $/person. Ranked 135 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 30.3%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kenya
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14,763 | +248 | +1.71% |
| 2024 | 14,514 | +255 | +1.79% |
| 2023 | 14,259 | +348 | +2.5% |
| 2022 | 13,911 | +224 | +1.64% |
| 2021 | 13,687 | +531 | +4.04% |
| 2020 | 13,156 | −199 | −1.49% |
| 2019 | 13,354 | +796 | +6.34% |
| 2018 | 12,558 | +777 | +6.59% |
| 2017 | 11,781 | +507 | +4.49% |
| 2016 | 11,275 | +106 | +0.95% |
| 2015 | 11,169 | +187 | +1.71% |
| 2014 | 10,982 | +187 | +1.73% |
| 2013 | 10,795 | +65 | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 10,730 | +130 | +1.23% |
| 2011 | 10,600 | +173 | +1.66% |
| 2010 | 10,427 | +451 | +4.52% |
| 2009 | 9,976 | −7 | −0.07% |
| 2008 | 9,983 | −310 | −3.02% |
| 2007 | 10,294 | +318 | +3.18% |
| 2006 | 9,976 | +257 | +2.64% |
| 2005 | 9,719 | +184 | +1.93% |
| 2004 | 9,535 | +105 | +1.11% |
| 2003 | 9,431 | −97 | −1.02% |
| 2002 | 9,528 | −332 | −3.36% |
| 2001 | 9,859 | −34 | −0.34% |
| 2000 | 9,893 | −331 | −3.24% |
| 1999 | 10,224 | −113 | −1.09% |
| 1998 | 10,337 | +2 | +0.02% |
| 1997 | 10,335 | −283 | −2.67% |
| 1996 | 10,618 | +79 | +0.75% |
| 1995 | 10,540 | +88 | +0.84% |
| 1994 | 10,451 | −90 | −0.86% |
| 1993 | 10,542 | −323 | −2.97% |
| 1992 | 10,865 | −465 | −4.11% |
| 1991 | 11,330 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.