Labor productivity in Mauritius in 2025 — 60,930 $/person. Ranked 65 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 152.3%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Mauritius
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60,930 | +1,941 | +3.29% |
| 2024 | 58,989 | +3,006 | +5.37% |
| 2023 | 55,984 | −857 | −1.51% |
| 2022 | 56,841 | +468 | +0.83% |
| 2021 | 56,372 | +4,068 | +7.78% |
| 2020 | 52,305 | −3,494 | −6.26% |
| 2019 | 55,799 | +700 | +1.27% |
| 2018 | 55,099 | +2,179 | +4.12% |
| 2017 | 52,920 | +1,433 | +2.78% |
| 2016 | 51,487 | +1,856 | +3.74% |
| 2015 | 49,631 | +1,111 | +2.29% |
| 2014 | 48,520 | +1,343 | +2.85% |
| 2013 | 47,177 | +355 | +0.76% |
| 2012 | 46,822 | +1,009 | +2.2% |
| 2011 | 45,813 | +1,941 | +4.42% |
| 2010 | 43,872 | +1,070 | +2.5% |
| 2009 | 42,802 | +911 | +2.18% |
| 2008 | 41,890 | +1,075 | +2.63% |
| 2007 | 40,815 | +2,064 | +5.33% |
| 2006 | 38,751 | +1,336 | +3.57% |
| 2005 | 37,415 | +453 | +1.23% |
| 2004 | 36,962 | +2,135 | +6.13% |
| 2003 | 34,827 | +319 | +0.92% |
| 2002 | 34,508 | −590 | −1.68% |
| 2001 | 35,098 | +1,491 | +4.44% |
| 2000 | 33,608 | +2,187 | +6.96% |
| 1999 | 31,420 | +383 | +1.23% |
| 1998 | 31,037 | +1,351 | +4.55% |
| 1997 | 29,687 | +1,113 | +3.89% |
| 1996 | 28,574 | +1,097 | +3.99% |
| 1995 | 27,476 | +786 | +2.94% |
| 1994 | 26,691 | +569 | +2.18% |
| 1993 | 26,121 | +866 | +3.43% |
| 1992 | 25,255 | +1,103 | +4.57% |
| 1991 | 24,152 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
