Labor productivity in Mozambique in 2025 — 3,536 $/person. Ranked 165 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 178.8%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Mozambique
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3,536 | −140 | −3.81% |
| 2024 | 3,676 | −46 | −1.24% |
| 2023 | 3,722 | +71 | +1.93% |
| 2022 | 3,652 | +59 | +1.63% |
| 2021 | 3,593 | −10 | −0.29% |
| 2020 | 3,603 | −103 | −2.78% |
| 2019 | 3,706 | −19 | −0.5% |
| 2018 | 3,725 | +22 | +0.59% |
| 2017 | 3,703 | −9 | −0.25% |
| 2016 | 3,713 | +64 | +1.76% |
| 2015 | 3,648 | +176 | +5.08% |
| 2014 | 3,472 | +178 | +5.4% |
| 2013 | 3,294 | +138 | +4.37% |
| 2012 | 3,156 | +173 | +5.79% |
| 2011 | 2,983 | +146 | +5.15% |
| 2010 | 2,837 | +133 | +4.92% |
| 2009 | 2,704 | +111 | +4.28% |
| 2008 | 2,593 | +127 | +5.17% |
| 2007 | 2,466 | +138 | +5.92% |
| 2006 | 2,328 | +174 | +8.08% |
| 2005 | 2,154 | +96 | +4.66% |
| 2004 | 2,058 | +127 | +6.57% |
| 2003 | 1,931 | +83 | +4.46% |
| 2002 | 1,848 | +121 | +7.02% |
| 2001 | 1,727 | +159 | +10.11% |
| 2000 | 1,569 | −23 | −1.48% |
| 1999 | 1,592 | +132 | +9.06% |
| 1998 | 1,460 | +101 | +7.46% |
| 1997 | 1,359 | +108 | +8.65% |
| 1996 | 1,250 | +80 | +6.82% |
| 1995 | 1,171 | −52 | −4.25% |
| 1994 | 1,223 | −10 | −0.83% |
| 1993 | 1,233 | +82 | +7.13% |
| 1992 | 1,151 | −118 | −9.27% |
| 1991 | 1,268 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
