Labor productivity in Tanzania in 2025 — 7,791 $/person. Ranked 154 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 101.9%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Tanzania
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7,791 | +196 | +2.58% |
| 2024 | 7,595 | +164 | +2.21% |
| 2023 | 7,431 | +126 | +1.72% |
| 2022 | 7,305 | +57 | +0.78% |
| 2021 | 7,249 | −13 | −0.18% |
| 2020 | 7,262 | −13 | −0.18% |
| 2019 | 7,275 | +167 | +2.35% |
| 2018 | 7,108 | +128 | +1.84% |
| 2017 | 6,980 | +184 | +2.7% |
| 2016 | 6,796 | +178 | +2.69% |
| 2015 | 6,618 | +144 | +2.22% |
| 2014 | 6,475 | +194 | +3.09% |
| 2013 | 6,281 | +225 | +3.72% |
| 2012 | 6,056 | +101 | +1.7% |
| 2011 | 5,955 | +320 | +5.68% |
| 2010 | 5,635 | +268 | +5% |
| 2009 | 5,366 | +171 | +3.3% |
| 2008 | 5,195 | +169 | +3.37% |
| 2007 | 5,025 | +206 | +4.28% |
| 2006 | 4,819 | +163 | +3.49% |
| 2005 | 4,657 | +196 | +4.39% |
| 2004 | 4,461 | +187 | +4.38% |
| 2003 | 4,274 | +147 | +3.56% |
| 2002 | 4,127 | +159 | +3.99% |
| 2001 | 3,968 | +118 | +3.06% |
| 2000 | 3,850 | +50 | +1.32% |
| 1999 | 3,800 | +71 | +1.91% |
| 1998 | 3,729 | +30 | +0.82% |
| 1997 | 3,699 | +56 | +1.53% |
| 1996 | 3,643 | +97 | +2.73% |
| 1995 | 3,546 | −15 | −0.43% |
| 1994 | 3,561 | −125 | −3.39% |
| 1993 | 3,686 | −92 | −2.43% |
| 1992 | 3,778 | −82 | −2.11% |
| 1991 | 3,860 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
