Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — South Africa

Safely managed drinking water in South Africa in 2024 — 68%. Ranked 90 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 4.8 pp.

2024 68% −0.5 pp vs 2023
World rank 90of 148
Period maximum 69.8%2020
Period minimum 63.2%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — South Africa, 2000–202462646668702000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 63.2%2001: 63.7%2002: 64.5%2003: 65.3%2004: 66.1%2005: 66.9%2006: 67.4%2007: 67.7%2008: 67.9%2009: 68.2%2010: 68.4%2011: 68.6%2012: 68.8%2013: 69%2014: 69.2%2015: 69.3%2016: 69.4%2017: 69.6%2018: 69.7%2019: 69.7%2020: 69.8%2021: 69.6%2022: 69.1%2023: 68.6%2024: 68%
Change over the period: +4.8 pp Annual average: 0.2 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: South Africa

South Africa 68%
World 73.7%
Southern Africa computed 66.1%
Safely managed drinking water — South Africa, by year South Africa All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 68 −0.5 pp
2023 68.6 −0.5 pp
2022 69.1 −0.5 pp
2021 69.6 −0.2 pp
2020 69.8 +0.1 pp
2019 69.7 +0.1 pp
2018 69.7 +0.1 pp
2017 69.6 +0.1 pp
2016 69.4 +0.1 pp
2015 69.3 +0.1 pp
2014 69.2 +0.2 pp
2013 69 +0.2 pp
2012 68.8 +0.2 pp
2011 68.6 +0.2 pp
2010 68.4 +0.2 pp
2009 68.2 +0.2 pp
2008 67.9 +0.3 pp
2007 67.7 +0.3 pp
2006 67.4 +0.4 pp
2005 66.9 +0.8 pp
2004 66.1 +0.8 pp
2003 65.3 +0.8 pp
2002 64.5 +0.8 pp
2001 63.7 +0.5 pp
2000 63.2

Southern Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.