Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Eswatini

Safely managed drinking water in Eswatini in 2024 — 38.2%. Ranked 119 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 10.8 pp.

2024 38.2% +0.4 pp vs 2023
World rank 119of 148
Period maximum 38.2%2024
Period minimum 27.4%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Eswatini, 2000–2024253035402000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 27.4%2001: 27.9%2002: 28.4%2003: 28.9%2004: 29.4%2005: 29.9%2006: 30.4%2007: 30.9%2008: 31.6%2009: 32.2%2010: 32.8%2011: 33.3%2012: 33.7%2013: 34.1%2014: 34.4%2015: 34.8%2016: 35.2%2017: 35.6%2018: 35.9%2019: 36.3%2020: 36.7%2021: 37.1%2022: 37.5%2023: 37.8%2024: 38.2%
Change over the period: +10.8 pp Annual average: 0.45 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Eswatini

Eswatini 38.2%
World 73.7%
Southern Africa computed 66.1%
Safely managed drinking water — Eswatini, by year Eswatini All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 38.2 +0.4 pp
2023 37.8 +0.4 pp
2022 37.5 +0.4 pp
2021 37.1 +0.4 pp
2020 36.7 +0.4 pp
2019 36.3 +0.4 pp
2018 35.9 +0.4 pp
2017 35.6 +0.4 pp
2016 35.2 +0.4 pp
2015 34.8 +0.4 pp
2014 34.4 +0.4 pp
2013 34.1 +0.4 pp
2012 33.7 +0.4 pp
2011 33.3 +0.5 pp
2010 32.8 +0.5 pp
2009 32.2 +0.6 pp
2008 31.6 +0.7 pp
2007 30.9 +0.5 pp
2006 30.4 +0.5 pp
2005 29.9 +0.5 pp
2004 29.4 +0.5 pp
2003 28.9 +0.5 pp
2002 28.4 +0.5 pp
2001 27.9 +0.5 pp
2000 27.4

Southern Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.