Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Lesotho

Safely managed drinking water in Lesotho in 2024 — 31.3%. Ranked 124 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 22.6 pp.

2024 31.3% +1 pp vs 2023
World rank 124of 148
Period maximum 31.3%2024
Period minimum 8.7%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Lesotho, 2000–20240102030402000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 8.7%2001: 9.6%2002: 10.5%2003: 11.5%2004: 12.4%2005: 13.4%2006: 14.4%2007: 15.4%2008: 16.4%2009: 17.4%2010: 18.4%2011: 19.4%2012: 20.4%2013: 21.3%2014: 22.2%2015: 23.1%2016: 23.9%2017: 24.8%2018: 25.7%2019: 26.6%2020: 27.5%2021: 28.5%2022: 29.4%2023: 30.4%2024: 31.3%
Change over the period: +22.6 pp Annual average: 0.94 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Lesotho

Lesotho 31.3%
World 73.7%
Southern Africa computed 66.1%
Safely managed drinking water — Lesotho, by year Lesotho All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 31.3 +1 pp
2023 30.4 +1 pp
2022 29.4 +0.9 pp
2021 28.5 +0.9 pp
2020 27.5 +0.9 pp
2019 26.6 +0.9 pp
2018 25.7 +0.9 pp
2017 24.8 +0.9 pp
2016 23.9 +0.9 pp
2015 23.1 +0.9 pp
2014 22.2 +0.9 pp
2013 21.3 +0.9 pp
2012 20.4 +1 pp
2011 19.4 +1 pp
2010 18.4 +1 pp
2009 17.4 +1 pp
2008 16.4 +1 pp
2007 15.4 +1 pp
2006 14.4 +1 pp
2005 13.4 +1 pp
2004 12.4 +1 pp
2003 11.5 +0.9 pp
2002 10.5 +0.9 pp
2001 9.6 +0.9 pp
2000 8.7

Southern Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.