Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Botswana

Safely managed drinking water in Botswana in 2024 — 63.3%. Ranked 98 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 4.1 pp.

2024 63.3% −0.6 pp vs 2023
World rank 98of 148
Period maximum 70.5%2011
Period minimum 59.2%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Botswana, 2000–202455606570752000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 59.2%2001: 59.6%2002: 59.8%2003: 60%2004: 60.2%2005: 60.4%2006: 61.7%2007: 63.5%2008: 65.3%2009: 67.1%2010: 68.8%2011: 70.5%2012: 70.4%2013: 69.9%2014: 69.3%2015: 68.7%2016: 68.1%2017: 67.6%2018: 67%2019: 66.4%2020: 65.8%2021: 65.1%2022: 64.5%2023: 63.9%2024: 63.3%
Change over the period: +4.1 pp Annual average: 0.17 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Botswana

Botswana 63.3%
World 73.7%
Southern Africa computed 66.1%
Safely managed drinking water — Botswana, by year Botswana All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 63.3 −0.6 pp
2023 63.9 −0.6 pp
2022 64.5 −0.6 pp
2021 65.1 −0.6 pp
2020 65.8 −0.6 pp
2019 66.4 −0.6 pp
2018 67 −0.6 pp
2017 67.6 −0.6 pp
2016 68.1 −0.6 pp
2015 68.7 −0.6 pp
2014 69.3 −0.6 pp
2013 69.9 −0.6 pp
2012 70.4 −0.1 pp
2011 70.5 +1.7 pp
2010 68.8 +1.7 pp
2009 67.1 +1.8 pp
2008 65.3 +1.8 pp
2007 63.5 +1.8 pp
2006 61.7 +1.3 pp
2005 60.4 +0.2 pp
2004 60.2 +0.2 pp
2003 60 +0.2 pp
2002 59.8 +0.2 pp
2001 59.6 +0.4 pp
2000 59.2

Southern Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.