Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Norway

Youth unemployment in Norway in 2025 — 13.42%. Ranked 96 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 1.47 pp.

2025 13.42% +1.29 pp vs 2024
World rank 96of 182
Period maximum 17.76%1995
Period minimum 7.34%2007

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Norway, 1991–2025510152019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 11.95%1992: 12.94%1993: 12.96%1994: 11.82%1995: 17.76%1996: 14.68%1997: 14.44%1998: 12.49%1999: 12.08%2000: 11.05%2001: 12.14%2002: 13.04%2003: 11.83%2004: 12.79%2005: 11.29%2006: 8.63%2007: 7.34%2008: 7.43%2009: 9.05%2010: 9.23%2011: 8.41%2012: 8.38%2013: 9.04%2014: 7.79%2015: 9.8%2016: 11.04%2017: 10.28%2018: 9.6%2019: 9.81%2020: 11.22%2021: 12.85%2022: 9.91%2023: 10.98%2024: 12.13%2025: 13.42%
Change over the period: +1.47 pp Annual average: 0.04 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Norway

Norway 13.42%
World 13.41%
Northern Europe computed 15.5%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Norway, by year Norway All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 13.42 +1.29 pp
2024 12.13 +1.16 pp
2023 10.98 +1.07 pp
2022 9.91 −2.94 pp
2021 12.85 +1.63 pp
2020 11.22 +1.4 pp
2019 9.81 +0.21 pp
2018 9.6 −0.68 pp
2017 10.28 −0.77 pp
2016 11.04 +1.24 pp
2015 9.8 +2.02 pp
2014 7.79 −1.26 pp
2013 9.04 +0.66 pp
2012 8.38 −0.03 pp
2011 8.41 −0.82 pp
2010 9.23 +0.18 pp
2009 9.05 +1.63 pp
2008 7.43 +0.09 pp
2007 7.34 −1.29 pp
2006 8.63 −2.66 pp
2005 11.29 −1.49 pp
2004 12.79 +0.96 pp
2003 11.83 −1.21 pp
2002 13.04 +0.89 pp
2001 12.14 +1.1 pp
2000 11.05 −1.04 pp
1999 12.08 −0.41 pp
1998 12.49 −1.94 pp
1997 14.44 −0.25 pp
1996 14.68 −3.08 pp
1995 17.76 +5.94 pp
1994 11.82 −1.14 pp
1993 12.96 +0.02 pp
1992 12.94 +0.99 pp
1991 11.95

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.