Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Denmark

Youth unemployment in Denmark in 2025 — 11.74%. Ranked 88 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 0.24 pp.

2025 11.74% −0.05 pp vs 2024
World rank 88of 182
Period maximum 16.31%2011
Period minimum 6.73%2000

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Denmark, 1991–202557.51012.51517.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 11.5%1992: 12.31%1993: 14.59%1994: 10.18%1995: 9.93%1996: 10.59%1997: 8.1%1998: 7.17%1999: 9.89%2000: 6.73%2001: 8.23%2002: 7.04%2003: 9.8%2004: 7.78%2005: 8.6%2006: 7.69%2007: 7.5%2008: 9.47%2009: 13.44%2010: 15.55%2011: 16.31%2012: 15.78%2013: 14.77%2014: 14.2%2015: 12.15%2016: 12.15%2017: 12.38%2018: 10.52%2019: 10.04%2020: 11.63%2021: 10.8%2022: 10.53%2023: 11.5%2024: 11.79%2025: 11.74%
Change over the period: +0.24 pp Annual average: 0.01 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Denmark

Denmark 11.74%
World 13.41%
Northern Europe computed 15.5%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Denmark, by year Denmark All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 11.74 −0.05 pp
2024 11.79 +0.29 pp
2023 11.5 +0.97 pp
2022 10.53 −0.27 pp
2021 10.8 −0.83 pp
2020 11.63 +1.59 pp
2019 10.04 −0.48 pp
2018 10.52 −1.86 pp
2017 12.38 +0.24 pp
2016 12.15 −0 pp
2015 12.15 −2.04 pp
2014 14.2 −0.58 pp
2013 14.77 −1 pp
2012 15.78 −0.53 pp
2011 16.31 +0.75 pp
2010 15.55 +2.11 pp
2009 13.44 +3.97 pp
2008 9.47 +1.98 pp
2007 7.5 −0.19 pp
2006 7.69 −0.92 pp
2005 8.6 +0.83 pp
2004 7.78 −2.03 pp
2003 9.8 +2.76 pp
2002 7.04 −1.19 pp
2001 8.23 +1.5 pp
2000 6.73 −3.16 pp
1999 9.89 +2.72 pp
1998 7.17 −0.93 pp
1997 8.1 −2.49 pp
1996 10.59 +0.65 pp
1995 9.93 −0.25 pp
1994 10.18 −4.41 pp
1993 14.59 +2.28 pp
1992 12.31 +0.81 pp
1991 11.5

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.