Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Northern Europe

Youth unemployment in Northern Europe in 2025 — 15.5%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 3.1 pp.

2025 15.5% +0.41 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 21.58%2012
Period minimum 12%2022

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Northern Europe, 1991–20251012.51517.52022.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 12.41%1992: 14.95%1993: 18.94%1994: 17.96%1995: 18.11%1996: 17.78%1997: 16.02%1998: 14.46%1999: 14.13%2000: 12.92%2001: 12.33%2002: 12.51%2003: 13.24%2004: 12.91%2005: 14.3%2006: 14.4%2007: 13.73%2008: 14.86%2009: 20.14%2010: 21.23%2011: 21.52%2012: 21.58%2013: 20.42%2014: 17.77%2015: 15.84%2016: 14.2%2017: 13.47%2018: 12.4%2019: 12.03%2020: 14.94%2021: 14.41%2022: 12%2023: 13.11%2024: 15.09%2025: 15.5%
Change over the period: +3.1 pp Annual average: 0.09 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Northern Europe

Northern Europe 15.5%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Northern Europe, by year Northern Europe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 15.5 +0.41 pp
2024 15.09 +1.98 pp
2023 13.11 +1.11 pp
2022 12 −2.41 pp
2021 14.41 −0.53 pp
2020 14.94 +2.92 pp
2019 12.03 −0.37 pp
2018 12.4 −1.08 pp
2017 13.47 −0.73 pp
2016 14.2 −1.64 pp
2015 15.84 −1.93 pp
2014 17.77 −2.65 pp
2013 20.42 −1.17 pp
2012 21.58 +0.06 pp
2011 21.52 +0.29 pp
2010 21.23 +1.09 pp
2009 20.14 +5.29 pp
2008 14.86 +1.12 pp
2007 13.73 −0.66 pp
2006 14.4 +0.1 pp
2005 14.3 +1.4 pp
2004 12.91 −0.33 pp
2003 13.24 +0.73 pp
2002 12.51 +0.18 pp
2001 12.33 −0.6 pp
2000 12.92 −1.2 pp
1999 14.13 −0.33 pp
1998 14.46 −1.56 pp
1997 16.02 −1.76 pp
1996 17.78 −0.33 pp
1995 18.11 +0.15 pp
1994 17.96 −0.97 pp
1993 18.94 +3.99 pp
1992 14.95 +2.54 pp
1991 12.41

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.