Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Iceland

Bank branches in Iceland in 2024 — 20.44 per 100k. Ranked 38 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 77.5%.

2024 20.44 per 100k −12.17% vs 2023
World rank 38of 153
Period maximum 90.99 per 100k2004
Period minimum 20.44 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Iceland, 2004–20240255075100200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 90.99 per 100k2005: 86.05 per 100k2006: 77.2 per 100k2007: 72.82 per 100k2008: 69.29 per 100k2009: 60.73 per 100k2010: 57.66 per 100k2011: 52.27 per 100k2012: 47.19 per 100k2013: 43.17 per 100k2014: 40.31 per 100k2015: 36.36 per 100k2016: 35.35 per 100k2017: 34.39 per 100k2018: 31.22 per 100k2019: 30.08 per 100k2020: 27.87 per 100k2021: 26.39 per 100k2022: 25.34 per 100k2023: 23.27 per 100k2024: 20.44 per 100k
Change over the period: −70.55 (−77.54%) Average annual rate: -7.2 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Iceland

Iceland 20.44 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 18.97 per 100k
Bank branches — Iceland, by year Iceland All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 20.44 −2.83 −12.17%
2023 23.27 −2.07 −8.16%
2022 25.34 −1.05 −3.99%
2021 26.39 −1.48 −5.3%
2020 27.87 −2.22 −7.37%
2019 30.08 −1.14 −3.64%
2018 31.22 −3.17 −9.22%
2017 34.39 −0.96 −2.72%
2016 35.35 −1.01 −2.78%
2015 36.36 −3.95 −9.8%
2014 40.31 −2.86 −6.62%
2013 43.17 −4.01 −8.5%
2012 47.19 −5.08 −9.72%
2011 52.27 −5.39 −9.35%
2010 57.66 −3.07 −5.06%
2009 60.73 −8.56 −12.36%
2008 69.29 −3.53 −4.84%
2007 72.82 −4.38 −5.67%
2006 77.2 −8.85 −10.29%
2005 86.05 −4.94 −5.43%
2004 90.99

Northern Europe, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.