Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Latvia

Bank branches in Latvia in 2024 — 4.44 per 100k. Ranked 128 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 85.9%.

2024 4.44 per 100k −4.96% vs 2023
World rank 128of 153
Period maximum 37.3 per 100k2007
Period minimum 4.44 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Latvia, 2004–2024010203040200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 31.59 per 100k2005: 31.91 per 100k2006: 33.37 per 100k2007: 37.3 per 100k2008: 36.6 per 100k2009: 35.39 per 100k2010: 34.22 per 100k2011: 32.78 per 100k2012: 24.63 per 100k2013: 21.58 per 100k2014: 20.38 per 100k2015: 18.05 per 100k2016: 17.13 per 100k2017: 16.48 per 100k2018: 14.67 per 100k2019: 9.7 per 100k2020: 7.02 per 100k2021: 6.57 per 100k2022: 5.19 per 100k2023: 4.68 per 100k2024: 4.44 per 100k
Change over the period: −27.14 (−85.93%) Average annual rate: -9.34 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Latvia

Latvia 4.44 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 18.97 per 100k
Bank branches — Latvia, by year Latvia All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 4.44 −0.23 −4.96%
2023 4.68 −0.51 −9.91%
2022 5.19 −1.38 −21.01%
2021 6.57 −0.45 −6.35%
2020 7.02 −2.68 −27.65%
2019 9.7 −4.98 −33.91%
2018 14.67 −1.81 −10.99%
2017 16.48 −0.65 −3.78%
2016 17.13 −0.92 −5.09%
2015 18.05 −2.33 −11.43%
2014 20.38 −1.2 −5.55%
2013 21.58 −3.05 −12.37%
2012 24.63 −8.15 −24.87%
2011 32.78 −1.44 −4.21%
2010 34.22 −1.18 −3.32%
2009 35.39 −1.21 −3.3%
2008 36.6 −0.7 −1.88%
2007 37.3 +3.93 +11.78%
2006 33.37 +1.47 +4.6%
2005 31.91 +0.32 +1.01%
2004 31.59

Northern Europe, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.