Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Lithuania

Bank branches in Lithuania in 2024 — 9.62 per 100k. Ranked 94 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 59.5%.

2024 9.62 per 100k −5.56% vs 2023
World rank 94of 153
Period maximum 29.9 per 100k2007
Period minimum 9.62 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Lithuania, 2004–20240102030200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 23.76 per 100k2005: 25.51 per 100k2006: 27.95 per 100k2007: 29.9 per 100k2008: 29.68 per 100k2009: 29.51 per 100k2010: 29.11 per 100k2011: 19.04 per 100k2012: 19.3 per 100k2013: 18.08 per 100k2014: 16.22 per 100k2015: 14.52 per 100k2016: 13.41 per 100k2017: 13.56 per 100k2018: 11.4 per 100k2019: 10.02 per 100k2020: 10.35 per 100k2021: 11.07 per 100k2022: 10.52 per 100k2023: 10.19 per 100k2024: 9.62 per 100k
Change over the period: −14.14 (−59.5%) Average annual rate: -4.42 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Lithuania

Lithuania 9.62 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 18.97 per 100k
Bank branches — Lithuania, by year Lithuania All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 9.62 −0.57 −5.56%
2023 10.19 −0.33 −3.13%
2022 10.52 −0.56 −5.02%
2021 11.07 +0.72 +6.95%
2020 10.35 +0.34 +3.38%
2019 10.02 −1.38 −12.14%
2018 11.4 −2.16 −15.94%
2017 13.56 +0.15 +1.11%
2016 13.41 −1.11 −7.66%
2015 14.52 −1.7 −10.48%
2014 16.22 −1.86 −10.28%
2013 18.08 −1.22 −6.33%
2012 19.3 +0.27 +1.39%
2011 19.04 −10.07 −34.59%
2010 29.11 −0.4 −1.37%
2009 29.51 −0.17 −0.58%
2008 29.68 −0.22 −0.74%
2007 29.9 +1.95 +6.99%
2006 27.95 +2.44 +9.55%
2005 25.51 +1.76 +7.39%
2004 23.76

Northern Europe, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.