Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Finland

Bank branches in Finland in 2024 — 3.78 per 100k. Ranked 134 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 71.3%.

2024 3.78 per 100k −35.61% vs 2023
World rank 134of 153
Period maximum 17.02 per 100k2011
Period minimum 3.78 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Finland, 2004–202405101520200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 13.18 per 100k2005: 14.42 per 100k2006: 16.94 per 100k2007: 16.08 per 100k2008: 16.02 per 100k2009: 14.97 per 100k2010: 15.51 per 100k2011: 17.02 per 100k2012: 15.5 per 100k2013: 14.1 per 100k2014: 9.42 per 100k2015: 8.49 per 100k2016: 7.3 per 100k2017: 6.46 per 100k2018: 4.8 per 100k2019: 4.48 per 100k2020: 4.01 per 100k2021: 6.15 per 100k2022: 5.97 per 100k2023: 5.87 per 100k2024: 3.78 per 100k
Change over the period: −9.39 (−71.3%) Average annual rate: -6.05 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Finland

Finland 3.78 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 18.97 per 100k
Bank branches — Finland, by year Finland All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 3.78 −2.09 −35.61%
2023 5.87 −0.09 −1.54%
2022 5.97 −0.18 −2.96%
2021 6.15 +2.14 +53.32%
2020 4.01 −0.47 −10.45%
2019 4.48 −0.32 −6.62%
2018 4.8 −1.66 −25.72%
2017 6.46 −0.85 −11.61%
2016 7.3 −1.18 −13.94%
2015 8.49 −0.93 −9.88%
2014 9.42 −4.68 −33.21%
2013 14.1 −1.39 −9%
2012 15.5 −1.53 −8.97%
2011 17.02 +1.52 +9.77%
2010 15.51 +0.54 +3.59%
2009 14.97 −1.05 −6.54%
2008 16.02 −0.06 −0.39%
2007 16.08 −0.86 −5.09%
2006 16.94 +2.52 +17.51%
2005 14.42 +1.24 +9.41%
2004 13.18

Northern Europe, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.