Food imports (% of merchandise imports) — all countries

Food imports (% of merchandise imports) — Latvia

Food imports (% of merchandise imports) in Latvia in 2025 — 17.85%. Ranked 3 in the world out of 24. Since 1994, the indicator has risen by 7.31 pp.

2025 17.85% −1.4 pp vs 2024
World rank 3of 24
Period maximum 19.25%2024
Period minimum 10.4%2006

Trend over time

1994–2025 · % of merchandise imports

Food imports (% of merchandise imports) — Latvia, 1994–20251012.51517.5201994199820022006201020142018202220251994: 10.54%1995: 10.47%1996: 12.95%1997: 13.42%1998: 12.82%1999: 12.41%2000: 12.29%2001: 12.39%2002: 12.87%2003: 11.69%2004: 10.74%2005: 10.76%2006: 10.4%2007: 10.68%2008: 13.01%2009: 17.26%2010: 14.76%2011: 13.42%2012: 13.59%2013: 13.81%2014: 14.57%2015: 14.29%2016: 15.75%2017: 16.29%2018: 16.3%2019: 16.96%2020: 18.41%2021: 15.09%2022: 14.9%2023: 18.68%2024: 19.25%2025: 17.85%
Change over the period: +7.31 pp Annual average: 0.24 pp
Food imports (% of merchandise imports) — Latvia, by year Latvia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 17.85 −1.4 pp
2024 19.25 +0.57 pp
2023 18.68 +3.78 pp
2022 14.9 −0.19 pp
2021 15.09 −3.32 pp
2020 18.41 +1.45 pp
2019 16.96 +0.66 pp
2018 16.3 +0.01 pp
2017 16.29 +0.54 pp
2016 15.75 +1.46 pp
2015 14.29 −0.28 pp
2014 14.57 +0.76 pp
2013 13.81 +0.22 pp
2012 13.59 +0.18 pp
2011 13.42 −1.34 pp
2010 14.76 −2.5 pp
2009 17.26 +4.25 pp
2008 13.01 +2.32 pp
2007 10.68 +0.28 pp
2006 10.4 −0.36 pp
2005 10.76 +0.01 pp
2004 10.74 −0.94 pp
2003 11.69 −1.18 pp
2002 12.87 +0.48 pp
2001 12.39 +0.1 pp
2000 12.29 −0.12 pp
1999 12.41 −0.41 pp
1998 12.82 −0.6 pp
1997 13.42 +0.47 pp
1996 12.95 +2.48 pp
1995 10.47 −0.07 pp
1994 10.54

Northern Europe, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of food in merchandise imports. The indicator reads as a measure of food dependence, but with a caveat: a high share occurs both in rich countries with little agriculture, where food is simply a large item of consumption, and in the poorest ones, where it means vulnerability to world grain prices. Comparing it with food insecurity and with the share of agriculture in the economy helps tell the two cases apart.

Important: A high value is not in itself a sign of trouble: in Singapore and Japan the share is high while the food supply is entirely secure. It is worth looking at together with food insecurity.

Source: UNCTADstat (UNCTAD), license CC BY 3.0 IGO.