Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Sao Tome and Principe

Safely managed drinking water in Sao Tome and Principe in 2024 — 36.7%. Ranked 120 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 10.7 pp.

2024 36.7% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 120of 148
Period maximum 36.7%2024
Period minimum 25.9%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Sao Tome and Principe, 2000–2024253035402000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 25.9%2001: 26.4%2002: 26.9%2003: 27.3%2004: 27.8%2005: 28.3%2006: 28.8%2007: 29.3%2008: 29.8%2009: 30.3%2010: 30.7%2011: 31.2%2012: 31.7%2013: 32.2%2014: 32.7%2015: 33.2%2016: 33.7%2017: 34.2%2018: 34.7%2019: 35.1%2020: 35.6%2021: 36.1%2022: 36.4%2023: 36.5%2024: 36.7%
Change over the period: +10.7 pp Annual average: 0.45 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Sao Tome and Principe

Sao Tome and Principe 36.7%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Sao Tome and Principe, by year Sao Tome and Principe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 36.7 +0.1 pp
2023 36.5 +0.2 pp
2022 36.4 +0.3 pp
2021 36.1 +0.5 pp
2020 35.6 +0.5 pp
2019 35.1 +0.5 pp
2018 34.7 +0.5 pp
2017 34.2 +0.5 pp
2016 33.7 +0.5 pp
2015 33.2 +0.5 pp
2014 32.7 +0.5 pp
2013 32.2 +0.5 pp
2012 31.7 +0.5 pp
2011 31.2 +0.5 pp
2010 30.7 +0.5 pp
2009 30.3 +0.5 pp
2008 29.8 +0.5 pp
2007 29.3 +0.5 pp
2006 28.8 +0.5 pp
2005 28.3 +0.5 pp
2004 27.8 +0.5 pp
2003 27.3 +0.5 pp
2002 26.9 +0.5 pp
2001 26.4 +0.4 pp
2000 25.9

Middle Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.