Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Democratic Republic of the Congo

Safely managed drinking water in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2024 — 11.9%. Ranked 144 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has fallen by 0.3 pp.

2024 11.9% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 144of 148
Period maximum 12.2%2001
Period minimum 11.2%2020

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2000–20241111.51212.52000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 12.2%2001: 12.2%2002: 12.2%2003: 12.2%2004: 12.2%2005: 12.2%2006: 12.1%2007: 12.1%2008: 12.1%2009: 12%2010: 12%2011: 11.9%2012: 11.9%2013: 11.8%2014: 11.8%2015: 11.7%2016: 11.6%2017: 11.5%2018: 11.4%2019: 11.3%2020: 11.2%2021: 11.4%2022: 11.6%2023: 11.7%2024: 11.9%
Change over the period: −0.3 pp Annual average: -0.01 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Democratic Republic of the Congo

Democratic Republic of the Congo 11.9%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Democratic Republic of the Congo, by year Democratic Republic of the Congo All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 11.9 +0.1 pp
2023 11.7 +0.1 pp
2022 11.6 +0.2 pp
2021 11.4 +0.2 pp
2020 11.2 −0.1 pp
2019 11.3 −0.1 pp
2018 11.4 −0.1 pp
2017 11.5 −0.1 pp
2016 11.6 −0.1 pp
2015 11.7 −0.1 pp
2014 11.8 −0.1 pp
2013 11.8 −0.1 pp
2012 11.9 −0.1 pp
2011 11.9 −0.1 pp
2010 12 −0 pp
2009 12 −0 pp
2008 12.1 −0 pp
2007 12.1 −0 pp
2006 12.1 −0 pp
2005 12.2 −0 pp
2004 12.2 −0 pp
2003 12.2 −0 pp
2002 12.2 −0 pp
2001 12.2 +0 pp
2000 12.2

Middle Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.