Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Central African Republic

Safely managed drinking water in the Central African Republic in 2024 — 6.2%. Ranked 148 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has fallen by 2.3 pp.

2024 6.2% +0 pp vs 2023
World rank 148of 148
Period maximum 8.5%2000
Period minimum 6.1%2021

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Central African Republic, 2000–202467892000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 8.5%2001: 8.4%2002: 8.3%2003: 8.1%2004: 8%2005: 7.9%2006: 7.7%2007: 7.6%2008: 7.5%2009: 7.4%2010: 7.3%2011: 7.1%2012: 7%2013: 6.9%2014: 6.8%2015: 6.7%2016: 6.6%2017: 6.5%2018: 6.4%2019: 6.3%2020: 6.2%2021: 6.1%2022: 6.1%2023: 6.2%2024: 6.2%
Change over the period: −2.3 pp Annual average: -0.1 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Central African Republic

Central African Republic 6.2%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Central African Republic, by year Central African Republic All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 6.2 +0 pp
2023 6.2 +0 pp
2022 6.1 +0 pp
2021 6.1 −0.1 pp
2020 6.2 −0.1 pp
2019 6.3 −0.1 pp
2018 6.4 −0.1 pp
2017 6.5 −0.1 pp
2016 6.6 −0.1 pp
2015 6.7 −0.1 pp
2014 6.8 −0.1 pp
2013 6.9 −0.1 pp
2012 7 −0.1 pp
2011 7.1 −0.1 pp
2010 7.3 −0.1 pp
2009 7.4 −0.1 pp
2008 7.5 −0.1 pp
2007 7.6 −0.1 pp
2006 7.7 −0.1 pp
2005 7.9 −0.1 pp
2004 8 −0.1 pp
2003 8.1 −0.1 pp
2002 8.3 −0.1 pp
2001 8.4 −0.1 pp
2000 8.5

Middle Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.