Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Northern Mariana Islands

Safely managed drinking water in the Northern Mariana Islands in 2024 — 81.5%. Ranked 73 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 1.8 pp.

2024 81.5% +0 pp vs 2023
World rank 73of 148
Period maximum 81.5%2019
Period minimum 79.6%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Northern Mariana Islands, 2000–202479.58080.58181.52000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 79.6%2001: 79.8%2002: 80%2003: 80.1%2004: 80.2%2005: 80.3%2006: 80.4%2007: 80.5%2008: 80.5%2009: 80.6%2010: 80.7%2011: 80.8%2012: 80.9%2013: 81%2014: 81%2015: 81.1%2016: 81.2%2017: 81.3%2018: 81.4%2019: 81.5%2020: 81.5%2021: 81.5%2022: 81.5%2023: 81.5%2024: 81.5%
Change over the period: +1.8 pp Annual average: 0.08 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Northern Mariana Islands

Northern Mariana Islands 81.5%
World 73.7%
Micronesia (subregion) computed 61.8%
High-income countries computed 95.4%
Safely managed drinking water — Northern Mariana Islands, by year Northern Mariana Islands All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 81.5 +0 pp
2023 81.5 +0 pp
2022 81.5 +0 pp
2021 81.5 +0 pp
2020 81.5 +0 pp
2019 81.5 +0.1 pp
2018 81.4 +0.1 pp
2017 81.3 +0.1 pp
2016 81.2 +0.1 pp
2015 81.1 +0.1 pp
2014 81 +0.1 pp
2013 81 +0.1 pp
2012 80.9 +0.1 pp
2011 80.8 +0.1 pp
2010 80.7 +0.1 pp
2009 80.6 +0.1 pp
2008 80.5 +0.1 pp
2007 80.5 +0.1 pp
2006 80.4 +0.1 pp
2005 80.3 +0.1 pp
2004 80.2 +0.1 pp
2003 80.1 +0.2 pp
2002 80 +0.2 pp
2001 79.8 +0.2 pp
2000 79.6

Micronesia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.