Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — East Asia & Pacific

Safely managed drinking water in East Asia & Pacific in 2024 — 75.2%. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 6.8 pp.

2024 75.2% +4.7 pp vs 2023
World rank
Period maximum 76.5%2014
Period minimum 65.1%2015

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — East Asia & Pacific, 2000–2024657075802000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 68.4%2001: 68.9%2002: 70%2003: 70.6%2004: 71.3%2005: 71.9%2006: 72.5%2007: 73%2008: 73.6%2009: 74.1%2010: 74.6%2011: 75.1%2012: 75.6%2013: 76%2014: 76.5%2015: 65.1%2016: 65.9%2017: 66.6%2018: 67.3%2019: 68%2020: 68.7%2021: 69.4%2022: 70%2023: 70.6%2024: 75.2%
Change over the period: +6.8 pp Annual average: 0.28 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: East Asia & Pacific

East Asia & Pacific 75.2%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — East Asia & Pacific, by year East Asia & Pacific All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 75.2 +4.7 pp
2023 70.6 +0.6 pp
2022 70 +0.6 pp
2021 69.4 +0.7 pp
2020 68.7 +0.7 pp
2019 68 +0.7 pp
2018 67.3 +0.7 pp
2017 66.6 +0.7 pp
2016 65.9 +0.7 pp
2015 65.1 −11.3 pp
2014 76.5 +0.4 pp
2013 76 +0.4 pp
2012 75.6 +0.5 pp
2011 75.1 +0.5 pp
2010 74.6 +0.5 pp
2009 74.1 +0.5 pp
2008 73.6 +0.5 pp
2007 73 +0.6 pp
2006 72.5 +0.6 pp
2005 71.9 +0.6 pp
2004 71.3 +0.6 pp
2003 70.6 +0.6 pp
2002 70 +1.1 pp
2001 68.9 +0.5 pp
2000 68.4

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.