Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Myanmar

Safely managed drinking water in Myanmar in 2024 — 59.7%. Ranked 101 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 32.6 pp.

2024 59.7% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 101of 148
Period maximum 59.7%2024
Period minimum 27.1%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Myanmar, 2000–202420304050602000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 27.1%2001: 28.6%2002: 30.2%2003: 31.8%2004: 33.4%2005: 35%2006: 36.7%2007: 38.4%2008: 40.1%2009: 41.9%2010: 43.7%2011: 45.3%2012: 46.8%2013: 48.3%2014: 49.8%2015: 51.3%2016: 52.8%2017: 54.4%2018: 56%2019: 57.6%2020: 58.8%2021: 59.5%2022: 59.6%2023: 59.6%2024: 59.7%
Change over the period: +32.6 pp Annual average: 1.36 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Myanmar

Myanmar 59.7%
World 73.7%
South-Eastern Asia computed 45.3%
Safely managed drinking water — Myanmar, by year Myanmar All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 59.7 +0.1 pp
2023 59.6 +0.1 pp
2022 59.6 +0.1 pp
2021 59.5 +0.7 pp
2020 58.8 +1.2 pp
2019 57.6 +1.6 pp
2018 56 +1.6 pp
2017 54.4 +1.6 pp
2016 52.8 +1.5 pp
2015 51.3 +1.5 pp
2014 49.8 +1.5 pp
2013 48.3 +1.5 pp
2012 46.8 +1.4 pp
2011 45.3 +1.6 pp
2010 43.7 +1.8 pp
2009 41.9 +1.8 pp
2008 40.1 +1.7 pp
2007 38.4 +1.7 pp
2006 36.7 +1.7 pp
2005 35 +1.6 pp
2004 33.4 +1.6 pp
2003 31.8 +1.6 pp
2002 30.2 +1.5 pp
2001 28.6 +1.5 pp
2000 27.1

South-Eastern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.