Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Malaysia

Safely managed drinking water in Malaysia in 2024 — 94.7%. Ranked 53 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 2.9 pp.

2024 94.7% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 53of 148
Period maximum 94.7%2024
Period minimum 91.8%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Malaysia, 2000–202491929394952000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 91.8%2001: 92%2002: 92.2%2003: 92.3%2004: 92.5%2005: 92.6%2006: 92.8%2007: 92.9%2008: 93.1%2009: 93.2%2010: 93.3%2011: 93.4%2012: 93.6%2013: 93.7%2014: 93.8%2015: 93.9%2016: 94%2017: 94.1%2018: 94.2%2019: 94.3%2020: 94.4%2021: 94.5%2022: 94.5%2023: 94.6%2024: 94.7%
Change over the period: +2.9 pp Annual average: 0.12 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Malaysia

Malaysia 94.7%
World 73.7%
South-Eastern Asia computed 45.3%
Safely managed drinking water — Malaysia, by year Malaysia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 94.7 +0.1 pp
2023 94.6 +0.1 pp
2022 94.5 +0.1 pp
2021 94.5 +0.1 pp
2020 94.4 +0.1 pp
2019 94.3 +0.1 pp
2018 94.2 +0.1 pp
2017 94.1 +0.1 pp
2016 94 +0.1 pp
2015 93.9 +0.1 pp
2014 93.8 +0.1 pp
2013 93.7 +0.1 pp
2012 93.6 +0.1 pp
2011 93.4 +0.1 pp
2010 93.3 +0.1 pp
2009 93.2 +0.1 pp
2008 93.1 +0.1 pp
2007 92.9 +0.1 pp
2006 92.8 +0.1 pp
2005 92.6 +0.2 pp
2004 92.5 +0.2 pp
2003 92.3 +0.2 pp
2002 92.2 +0.2 pp
2001 92 +0.2 pp
2000 91.8

South-Eastern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.