Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Latvia

Safely managed drinking water in Latvia in 2024 — 97%. Ranked 40 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 4.5 pp.

2024 97% +0 pp vs 2023
World rank 40of 148
Period maximum 97%2024
Period minimum 92.5%2001

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Latvia, 2000–2024929496982000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 92.5%2001: 92.5%2002: 92.5%2003: 92.5%2004: 92.6%2005: 92.6%2006: 92.7%2007: 92.9%2008: 93.2%2009: 93.5%2010: 93.7%2011: 94%2012: 94.3%2013: 94.5%2014: 94.8%2015: 95%2016: 95.3%2017: 95.6%2018: 95.9%2019: 96.1%2020: 96.4%2021: 96.7%2022: 96.9%2023: 97%2024: 97%
Change over the period: +4.5 pp Annual average: 0.19 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Latvia

Latvia 97%
World 73.7%
Northern Europe computed 99.5%
High-income countries computed 95.4%
Safely managed drinking water — Latvia, by year Latvia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 97 +0 pp
2023 97 +0 pp
2022 96.9 +0.3 pp
2021 96.7 +0.3 pp
2020 96.4 +0.3 pp
2019 96.1 +0.3 pp
2018 95.9 +0.3 pp
2017 95.6 +0.3 pp
2016 95.3 +0.3 pp
2015 95 +0.3 pp
2014 94.8 +0.3 pp
2013 94.5 +0.3 pp
2012 94.3 +0.3 pp
2011 94 +0.3 pp
2010 93.7 +0.3 pp
2009 93.5 +0.3 pp
2008 93.2 +0.3 pp
2007 92.9 +0.2 pp
2006 92.7 +0.1 pp
2005 92.6 +0 pp
2004 92.6 +0 pp
2003 92.5 +0 pp
2002 92.5 +0 pp
2001 92.5 −0 pp
2000 92.5

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.