Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Europe & Central Asia

Safely managed drinking water in Europe & Central Asia in 2024 — 92.5%. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 6 pp.

2024 92.5% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank
Period maximum 92.5%2024
Period minimum 86.5%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Europe & Central Asia, 2000–202486889092942000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 86.5%2001: 86.6%2002: 86.8%2003: 86.9%2004: 87.3%2005: 88.4%2006: 88.7%2007: 89.1%2008: 89.4%2009: 89.7%2010: 90%2011: 90.3%2012: 90.6%2013: 90.9%2014: 91%2015: 91.2%2016: 91.4%2017: 91.6%2018: 91.8%2019: 92%2020: 92.1%2021: 92.2%2022: 92.3%2023: 92.4%2024: 92.5%
Change over the period: +6 pp Annual average: 0.25 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Europe & Central Asia

Europe & Central Asia 92.5%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Europe & Central Asia, by year Europe & Central Asia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 92.5 +0.1 pp
2023 92.4 +0.1 pp
2022 92.3 +0.1 pp
2021 92.2 +0.1 pp
2020 92.1 +0.1 pp
2019 92 +0.2 pp
2018 91.8 +0.2 pp
2017 91.6 +0.2 pp
2016 91.4 +0.2 pp
2015 91.2 +0.2 pp
2014 91 +0.2 pp
2013 90.9 +0.3 pp
2012 90.6 +0.3 pp
2011 90.3 +0.3 pp
2010 90 +0.3 pp
2009 89.7 +0.3 pp
2008 89.4 +0.3 pp
2007 89.1 +0.3 pp
2006 88.7 +0.3 pp
2005 88.4 +1.1 pp
2004 87.3 +0.4 pp
2003 86.9 +0.2 pp
2002 86.8 +0.2 pp
2001 86.6 +0.1 pp
2000 86.5

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.