Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Iceland

Safely managed drinking water in Iceland in 2024 — 100%. Ranked 1 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 9.8 pp.

2024 100% +0 pp vs 2023
World rank 1of 148
Period maximum 100%2021
Period minimum 90.2%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Iceland, 2000–20249092.59597.51002000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 90.2%2001: 90.7%2002: 91.2%2003: 91.8%2004: 92.3%2005: 92.8%2006: 93.4%2007: 93.9%2008: 94.4%2009: 95%2010: 95.5%2011: 96%2012: 96.6%2013: 97.1%2014: 97.6%2015: 98.2%2016: 98.7%2017: 99.3%2018: 99.8%2019: 100%2020: 100%2021: 100%2022: 100%2023: 100%2024: 100%
Change over the period: +9.8 pp Annual average: 0.41 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Iceland

Iceland 100%
World 73.7%
Northern Europe computed 99.5%
High-income countries computed 95.4%
Safely managed drinking water — Iceland, by year Iceland All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 100 +0 pp
2023 100 +0 pp
2022 100 −0 pp
2021 100 +0 pp
2020 100 −0 pp
2019 100 +0.2 pp
2018 99.8 +0.5 pp
2017 99.3 +0.5 pp
2016 98.7 +0.5 pp
2015 98.2 +0.5 pp
2014 97.6 +0.5 pp
2013 97.1 +0.5 pp
2012 96.6 +0.5 pp
2011 96 +0.5 pp
2010 95.5 +0.5 pp
2009 95 +0.5 pp
2008 94.4 +0.5 pp
2007 93.9 +0.5 pp
2006 93.4 +0.5 pp
2005 92.8 +0.5 pp
2004 92.3 +0.5 pp
2003 91.8 +0.5 pp
2002 91.2 +0.5 pp
2001 90.7 +0.5 pp
2000 90.2

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.