Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Southern Africa

Youth unemployment in Southern Africa in 2025 — 57.44%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 15.69 pp.

2025 57.44% −0.23 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 62.34%2021
Period minimum 41.1%1996

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Southern Africa, 1991–20254050607019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 41.75%1992: 42.35%1993: 42.72%1994: 42.45%1995: 41.6%1996: 41.1%1997: 41.2%1998: 41.69%1999: 41.97%2000: 41.91%2001: 42.22%2002: 42.55%2003: 43.12%2004: 43.06%2005: 43%2006: 42.81%2007: 42.99%2008: 43.45%2009: 46.01%2010: 48.7%2011: 47.9%2012: 49.06%2013: 49.18%2014: 49.14%2015: 48.35%2016: 51.39%2017: 51.3%2018: 51.42%2019: 54.74%2020: 57.17%2021: 62.34%2022: 58.88%2023: 57.63%2024: 57.67%2025: 57.44%
Change over the period: +15.69 pp Annual average: 0.46 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Southern Africa

Southern Africa 57.44%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Southern Africa, by year Southern Africa All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 57.44 −0.23 pp
2024 57.67 +0.04 pp
2023 57.63 −1.25 pp
2022 58.88 −3.46 pp
2021 62.34 +5.17 pp
2020 57.17 +2.43 pp
2019 54.74 +3.32 pp
2018 51.42 +0.12 pp
2017 51.3 −0.09 pp
2016 51.39 +3.04 pp
2015 48.35 −0.79 pp
2014 49.14 −0.05 pp
2013 49.18 +0.13 pp
2012 49.06 +1.16 pp
2011 47.9 −0.8 pp
2010 48.7 +2.68 pp
2009 46.01 +2.57 pp
2008 43.45 +0.46 pp
2007 42.99 +0.18 pp
2006 42.81 −0.19 pp
2005 43 −0.06 pp
2004 43.06 −0.07 pp
2003 43.12 +0.58 pp
2002 42.55 +0.32 pp
2001 42.22 +0.31 pp
2000 41.91 −0.06 pp
1999 41.97 +0.29 pp
1998 41.69 +0.49 pp
1997 41.2 +0.09 pp
1996 41.1 −0.49 pp
1995 41.6 −0.86 pp
1994 42.45 −0.27 pp
1993 42.72 +0.37 pp
1992 42.35 +0.61 pp
1991 41.75

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.