Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Brazil

Youth unemployment in Brazil in 2025 — 13.98%. Ranked 101 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 1.23 pp.

2025 13.98% −1.69 pp vs 2024
World rank 101of 182
Period maximum 30.27%2020
Period minimum 11.41%1993

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Brazil, 1991–202510152025303519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 12.75%1992: 13.12%1993: 11.41%1994: 12.35%1995: 13.26%1996: 14.63%1997: 16.62%1998: 19.25%1999: 20.64%2000: 20.33%2001: 20.02%2002: 20.6%2003: 21.38%2004: 20.03%2005: 21.4%2006: 19.88%2007: 18.8%2008: 17.56%2009: 19.77%2010: 18.24%2011: 16.93%2012: 15.85%2013: 15.7%2014: 15.5%2015: 19.49%2016: 26.6%2017: 28.59%2018: 27.96%2019: 27.1%2020: 30.27%2021: 28.31%2022: 20.73%2023: 17.94%2024: 15.67%2025: 13.98%
Change over the period: +1.23 pp Annual average: 0.04 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Brazil

Brazil 13.98%
World 13.41%
South America computed 14.31%
Youth unemployment — Brazil, by year Brazil All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 13.98 −1.69 pp
2024 15.67 −2.26 pp
2023 17.94 −2.79 pp
2022 20.73 −7.58 pp
2021 28.31 −1.96 pp
2020 30.27 +3.17 pp
2019 27.1 −0.86 pp
2018 27.96 −0.64 pp
2017 28.59 +2 pp
2016 26.6 +7.1 pp
2015 19.49 +4 pp
2014 15.5 −0.2 pp
2013 15.7 −0.15 pp
2012 15.85 −1.07 pp
2011 16.93 −1.31 pp
2010 18.24 −1.54 pp
2009 19.77 +2.22 pp
2008 17.56 −1.24 pp
2007 18.8 −1.09 pp
2006 19.88 −1.52 pp
2005 21.4 +1.37 pp
2004 20.03 −1.35 pp
2003 21.38 +0.78 pp
2002 20.6 +0.58 pp
2001 20.02 −0.31 pp
2000 20.33 −0.31 pp
1999 20.64 +1.39 pp
1998 19.25 +2.64 pp
1997 16.62 +1.99 pp
1996 14.63 +1.37 pp
1995 13.26 +0.91 pp
1994 12.35 +0.95 pp
1993 11.41 −1.71 pp
1992 13.12 +0.37 pp
1991 12.75

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.