Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Brazil

Female unemployment in Brazil in 2025 — 7.33%. Ranked 120 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 1.57 pp.

2025 7.33% −1.05 pp vs 2024
World rank 120of 182
Period maximum 16.44%2021
Period minimum 7.33%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Brazil, 1991–202557.51012.51517.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 8.9%1992: 9.11%1993: 7.44%1994: 8.29%1995: 9.07%1996: 10.73%1997: 12.12%1998: 13.69%1999: 14.68%2000: 14.23%2001: 13.77%2002: 13.71%2003: 14.28%2004: 13.36%2005: 13.99%2006: 12.8%2007: 12.5%2008: 11.26%2009: 12.69%2010: 11.47%2011: 10.44%2012: 9.25%2013: 8.98%2014: 8.33%2015: 10.31%2016: 13.61%2017: 14.89%2018: 14.42%2019: 14.35%2020: 16.25%2021: 16.44%2022: 11.52%2023: 9.7%2024: 8.37%2025: 7.33%
Change over the period: −1.57 pp Annual average: -0.05 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Brazil

Brazil 7.33%
World 4.94%
South America computed 7.44%
Female unemployment — Brazil, by year Brazil All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 7.33 −1.05 pp
2024 8.37 −1.32 pp
2023 9.7 −1.82 pp
2022 11.52 −4.93 pp
2021 16.44 +0.19 pp
2020 16.25 +1.9 pp
2019 14.35 −0.07 pp
2018 14.42 −0.47 pp
2017 14.89 +1.28 pp
2016 13.61 +3.3 pp
2015 10.31 +1.99 pp
2014 8.33 −0.66 pp
2013 8.98 −0.26 pp
2012 9.25 −1.2 pp
2011 10.44 −1.02 pp
2010 11.47 −1.22 pp
2009 12.69 +1.43 pp
2008 11.26 −1.24 pp
2007 12.5 −0.29 pp
2006 12.8 −1.2 pp
2005 13.99 +0.64 pp
2004 13.36 −0.92 pp
2003 14.28 +0.57 pp
2002 13.71 −0.07 pp
2001 13.77 −0.46 pp
2000 14.23 −0.45 pp
1999 14.68 +0.99 pp
1998 13.69 +1.57 pp
1997 12.12 +1.4 pp
1996 10.73 +1.66 pp
1995 9.07 +0.79 pp
1994 8.29 +0.85 pp
1993 7.44 −1.67 pp
1992 9.11 +0.21 pp
1991 8.9

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.