Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — South America

Female unemployment in South America in 2025 — 7.44%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 1.05 pp.

2025 7.44% −0.74 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 14.4%2000
Period minimum 7.44%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — South America, 1991–2025681012141619911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 8.49%1992: 8.48%1993: 7.95%1994: 8.97%1995: 10.29%1996: 11.65%1997: 12.08%1998: 12.75%1999: 14.39%2000: 14.4%2001: 13.5%2002: 13.82%2003: 13.89%2004: 13.24%2005: 12.39%2006: 11.44%2007: 10.9%2008: 10.15%2009: 11.09%2010: 10.09%2011: 9.27%2012: 8.58%2013: 8.37%2014: 7.88%2015: 8.82%2016: 10.63%2017: 11.34%2018: 11.25%2019: 11.4%2020: 14.31%2021: 13.4%2022: 9.82%2023: 8.68%2024: 8.18%2025: 7.44%
Change over the period: −1.05 pp Annual average: -0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: South America

South America 7.44%
World 4.94%
Female unemployment — South America, by year South America All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 7.44 −0.74 pp
2024 8.18 −0.5 pp
2023 8.68 −1.13 pp
2022 9.82 −3.58 pp
2021 13.4 −0.91 pp
2020 14.31 +2.91 pp
2019 11.4 +0.15 pp
2018 11.25 −0.08 pp
2017 11.34 +0.71 pp
2016 10.63 +1.81 pp
2015 8.82 +0.94 pp
2014 7.88 −0.49 pp
2013 8.37 −0.21 pp
2012 8.58 −0.69 pp
2011 9.27 −0.81 pp
2010 10.09 −1 pp
2009 11.09 +0.94 pp
2008 10.15 −0.74 pp
2007 10.9 −0.54 pp
2006 11.44 −0.96 pp
2005 12.39 −0.84 pp
2004 13.24 −0.65 pp
2003 13.89 +0.06 pp
2002 13.82 +0.33 pp
2001 13.5 −0.9 pp
2000 14.4 +0 pp
1999 14.39 +1.64 pp
1998 12.75 +0.67 pp
1997 12.08 +0.43 pp
1996 11.65 +1.36 pp
1995 10.29 +1.32 pp
1994 8.97 +1.03 pp
1993 7.95 −0.54 pp
1992 8.48 −0.01 pp
1991 8.49

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.