Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Colombia

Youth unemployment in Colombia in 2025 — 17.65%. Ranked 122 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 1.46 pp.

2025 17.65% −1.76 pp vs 2024
World rank 122of 182
Period maximum 37.39%2000
Period minimum 14.87%1993

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Colombia, 1991–20251020304019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 19.11%1992: 18.04%1993: 14.87%1994: 15.71%1995: 16.41%1996: 21.88%1997: 22.47%1998: 27.61%1999: 36.5%2000: 37.39%2001: 27.49%2002: 26.9%2003: 25.15%2004: 26.32%2005: 22.6%2006: 22.33%2007: 22.2%2008: 22.8%2009: 23.54%2010: 22.57%2011: 21.17%2012: 20.09%2013: 18.73%2014: 18.25%2015: 17.32%2016: 18.27%2017: 18.47%2018: 19.45%2019: 20.66%2020: 27.25%2021: 24.76%2022: 20.97%2023: 19.37%2024: 19.41%2025: 17.65%
Change over the period: −1.46 pp Annual average: -0.04 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Colombia

Colombia 17.65%
World 13.41%
South America computed 14.31%
Youth unemployment — Colombia, by year Colombia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 17.65 −1.76 pp
2024 19.41 +0.05 pp
2023 19.37 −1.61 pp
2022 20.97 −3.79 pp
2021 24.76 −2.49 pp
2020 27.25 +6.59 pp
2019 20.66 +1.21 pp
2018 19.45 +0.98 pp
2017 18.47 +0.19 pp
2016 18.27 +0.96 pp
2015 17.32 −0.93 pp
2014 18.25 −0.48 pp
2013 18.73 −1.36 pp
2012 20.09 −1.08 pp
2011 21.17 −1.4 pp
2010 22.57 −0.97 pp
2009 23.54 +0.74 pp
2008 22.8 +0.61 pp
2007 22.2 −0.13 pp
2006 22.33 −0.27 pp
2005 22.6 −3.73 pp
2004 26.32 +1.17 pp
2003 25.15 −1.74 pp
2002 26.9 −0.59 pp
2001 27.49 −9.9 pp
2000 37.39 +0.89 pp
1999 36.5 +8.9 pp
1998 27.61 +5.13 pp
1997 22.47 +0.59 pp
1996 21.88 +5.47 pp
1995 16.41 +0.7 pp
1994 15.71 +0.84 pp
1993 14.87 −3.17 pp
1992 18.04 −1.07 pp
1991 19.11

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.