Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Bolivia

Youth unemployment in Bolivia in 2025 — 5.01%. Ranked 26 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 0.18 pp.

2025 5.01% −0.16 pp vs 2024
World rank 26of 182
Period maximum 15.24%2020
Period minimum 3.36%2012

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Bolivia, 1991–20250510152019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 4.83%1992: 4.91%1993: 4.94%1994: 4.97%1995: 4.41%1996: 3.95%1997: 3.48%1998: 3.67%1999: 3.98%2000: 4.27%2001: 4.59%2002: 4.74%2003: 4.96%2004: 5.08%2005: 5.22%2006: 5.35%2007: 5.55%2008: 5.69%2009: 5.28%2010: 5.28%2011: 5.33%2012: 3.36%2013: 5.39%2014: 4.77%2015: 6.85%2016: 6.77%2017: 6.65%2018: 6.78%2019: 6.93%2020: 15.24%2021: 8.2%2022: 6.04%2023: 4.97%2024: 5.17%2025: 5.01%
Change over the period: +0.18 pp Annual average: 0.01 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Bolivia

Bolivia 5.01%
World 13.41%
South America computed 14.31%
Youth unemployment — Bolivia, by year Bolivia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 5.01 −0.16 pp
2024 5.17 +0.2 pp
2023 4.97 −1.08 pp
2022 6.04 −2.16 pp
2021 8.2 −7.04 pp
2020 15.24 +8.31 pp
2019 6.93 +0.15 pp
2018 6.78 +0.13 pp
2017 6.65 −0.12 pp
2016 6.77 −0.08 pp
2015 6.85 +2.08 pp
2014 4.77 −0.62 pp
2013 5.39 +2.03 pp
2012 3.36 −1.97 pp
2011 5.33 +0.04 pp
2010 5.28 +0 pp
2009 5.28 −0.4 pp
2008 5.69 +0.14 pp
2007 5.55 +0.2 pp
2006 5.35 +0.13 pp
2005 5.22 +0.14 pp
2004 5.08 +0.12 pp
2003 4.96 +0.21 pp
2002 4.74 +0.15 pp
2001 4.59 +0.33 pp
2000 4.27 +0.28 pp
1999 3.98 +0.31 pp
1998 3.67 +0.19 pp
1997 3.48 −0.47 pp
1996 3.95 −0.46 pp
1995 4.41 −0.56 pp
1994 4.97 +0.04 pp
1993 4.94 +0.02 pp
1992 4.91 +0.08 pp
1991 4.83

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.