Vulnerable employment — all countries

Vulnerable employment — Namibia

Vulnerable employment in Namibia in 2025 — 29.94%. Ranked 95 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 9.65 pp.

2025 29.94% −0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank 95of 182
Period maximum 39.59%1991
Period minimum 25.24%2016

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of employment

Vulnerable employment — Namibia, 1991–20252530354019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 39.59%1992: 39.53%1993: 39.47%1994: 39.37%1995: 39.26%1996: 39.12%1997: 38.93%1998: 38.56%1999: 38.16%2000: 37.7%2001: 37.29%2002: 36.78%2003: 36.25%2004: 35.62%2005: 35%2006: 34.39%2007: 33.81%2008: 33.27%2009: 32.8%2010: 32.37%2011: 32.19%2012: 31.9%2013: 33.04%2014: 30.29%2015: 27.75%2016: 25.24%2017: 28.24%2018: 31.23%2019: 31.16%2020: 31.43%2021: 30.83%2022: 30.69%2023: 30.49%2024: 30.23%2025: 29.94%
Change over the period: −9.65 pp Annual average: -0.28 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Namibia

Namibia 29.94%
World 42.38%
Southern Africa computed 13.76%
Vulnerable employment — Namibia, by year Namibia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 29.94 −0.3 pp
2024 30.23 −0.26 pp
2023 30.49 −0.2 pp
2022 30.69 −0.14 pp
2021 30.83 −0.61 pp
2020 31.43 +0.27 pp
2019 31.16 −0.07 pp
2018 31.23 +2.99 pp
2017 28.24 +3 pp
2016 25.24 −2.51 pp
2015 27.75 −2.54 pp
2014 30.29 −2.75 pp
2013 33.04 +1.14 pp
2012 31.9 −0.29 pp
2011 32.19 −0.18 pp
2010 32.37 −0.43 pp
2009 32.8 −0.47 pp
2008 33.27 −0.54 pp
2007 33.81 −0.58 pp
2006 34.39 −0.61 pp
2005 35 −0.62 pp
2004 35.62 −0.63 pp
2003 36.25 −0.53 pp
2002 36.78 −0.51 pp
2001 37.29 −0.42 pp
2000 37.7 −0.45 pp
1999 38.16 −0.4 pp
1998 38.56 −0.37 pp
1997 38.93 −0.19 pp
1996 39.12 −0.14 pp
1995 39.26 −0.11 pp
1994 39.37 −0.1 pp
1993 39.47 −0.06 pp
1992 39.53 −0.06 pp
1991 39.59

Southern Africa, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of own-account workers and contributing family workers in total employment. The ILO devised the category as a substitute for informal employment where informality is not measured: such workers usually have no employment contract, no social insurance and no protection against dismissal, and their income depends directly on what they produce. In the poorest countries this share exceeds three quarters of the employed — wage work there is closer to an exception.

Important: Not the same as informal employment: an employee without a contract does not fall into this category, though they are no better protected. The indicator understates informality in countries where off-the-books hiring is widespread.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.