Labor productivity in Turkmenistan in 2025 — 69,785 $/person. Ranked 57 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 168.6%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Turkmenistan
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 69,785 | +3,155 | +4.73% |
| 2024 | 66,630 | +2,418 | +3.77% |
| 2023 | 64,212 | +2,977 | +4.86% |
| 2022 | 61,235 | +1,633 | +2.74% |
| 2021 | 59,602 | +2,326 | +4.06% |
| 2020 | 57,276 | +4,108 | +7.73% |
| 2019 | 53,169 | +2,530 | +5% |
| 2018 | 50,639 | +2,310 | +4.78% |
| 2017 | 48,329 | +2,285 | +4.96% |
| 2016 | 46,044 | +2,029 | +4.61% |
| 2015 | 44,015 | +2,011 | +4.79% |
| 2014 | 42,004 | +3,510 | +9.12% |
| 2013 | 38,494 | +3,143 | +8.89% |
| 2012 | 35,351 | +3,191 | +9.92% |
| 2011 | 32,159 | +4,037 | +14.35% |
| 2010 | 28,123 | +2,045 | +7.84% |
| 2009 | 26,077 | +813 | +3.22% |
| 2008 | 25,264 | +3,031 | +13.63% |
| 2007 | 22,234 | +1,883 | +9.25% |
| 2006 | 20,351 | +1,706 | +9.15% |
| 2005 | 18,645 | +1,949 | +11.67% |
| 2004 | 16,696 | +272 | +1.66% |
| 2003 | 16,423 | −94 | −0.57% |
| 2002 | 16,518 | −740 | −4.29% |
| 2001 | 17,258 | +102 | +0.59% |
| 2000 | 17,156 | +309 | +1.84% |
| 1999 | 16,847 | +2,579 | +18.08% |
| 1998 | 14,268 | +956 | +7.18% |
| 1997 | 13,312 | −2,621 | −16.45% |
| 1996 | 15,933 | +1,182 | +8.02% |
| 1995 | 14,751 | −1,311 | −8.16% |
| 1994 | 16,062 | −4,337 | −21.26% |
| 1993 | 20,399 | −228 | −1.1% |
| 1992 | 20,626 | −5,359 | −20.62% |
| 1991 | 25,985 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
