Labor productivity in Kyrgyzstan in 2025 — 20,907 $/person. Ranked 121 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 41.7%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kyrgyzstan
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20,907 | +1,693 | +8.81% |
| 2024 | 19,213 | +1,433 | +8.06% |
| 2023 | 17,780 | +1,540 | +9.48% |
| 2022 | 16,240 | +946 | +6.18% |
| 2021 | 15,295 | −11 | −0.07% |
| 2020 | 15,305 | −924 | −5.69% |
| 2019 | 16,229 | +465 | +2.95% |
| 2018 | 15,764 | −137 | −0.86% |
| 2017 | 15,901 | +1,060 | +7.14% |
| 2016 | 14,841 | +447 | +3.11% |
| 2015 | 14,394 | +229 | +1.61% |
| 2014 | 14,165 | +172 | +1.23% |
| 2013 | 13,993 | +1,806 | +14.82% |
| 2012 | 12,187 | +187 | +1.56% |
| 2011 | 11,999 | +377 | +3.25% |
| 2010 | 11,622 | −271 | −2.28% |
| 2009 | 11,893 | +178 | +1.52% |
| 2008 | 11,715 | +927 | +8.6% |
| 2007 | 10,787 | +873 | +8.81% |
| 2006 | 9,914 | +185 | +1.91% |
| 2005 | 9,729 | −222 | −2.23% |
| 2004 | 9,951 | +603 | +6.45% |
| 2003 | 9,348 | +576 | +6.57% |
| 2002 | 8,771 | −181 | −2.02% |
| 2001 | 8,953 | +389 | +4.55% |
| 2000 | 8,563 | +366 | +4.46% |
| 1999 | 8,197 | +144 | +1.79% |
| 1998 | 8,053 | −15 | −0.19% |
| 1997 | 8,068 | +713 | +9.69% |
| 1996 | 7,356 | +440 | +6.37% |
| 1995 | 6,916 | −605 | −8.05% |
| 1994 | 7,521 | −2,373 | −23.98% |
| 1993 | 9,894 | −2,227 | −18.37% |
| 1992 | 12,120 | −2,633 | −17.85% |
| 1991 | 14,753 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.