Labor productivity in Kazakhstan in 2025 — 82,765 $/person. Ranked 46 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 165.5%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kazakhstan
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 82,765 | +6,941 | +9.15% |
| 2024 | 75,824 | +2,310 | +3.14% |
| 2023 | 73,513 | +2,221 | +3.11% |
| 2022 | 71,293 | −38 | −0.05% |
| 2021 | 71,330 | +2,622 | +3.82% |
| 2020 | 68,708 | −1,602 | −2.28% |
| 2019 | 70,310 | +2,252 | +3.31% |
| 2018 | 68,057 | +2,014 | +3.05% |
| 2017 | 66,044 | +2,008 | +3.14% |
| 2016 | 64,036 | +242 | +0.38% |
| 2015 | 63,794 | +255 | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 63,539 | +2,083 | +3.39% |
| 2013 | 61,456 | +3,053 | +5.23% |
| 2012 | 58,403 | +2,250 | +4.01% |
| 2011 | 56,153 | +3,271 | +6.18% |
| 2010 | 52,882 | +2,781 | +5.55% |
| 2009 | 50,102 | +203 | +0.41% |
| 2008 | 49,898 | +377 | +0.76% |
| 2007 | 49,522 | +2,886 | +6.19% |
| 2006 | 46,636 | +3,763 | +8.78% |
| 2005 | 42,873 | +3,458 | +8.77% |
| 2004 | 39,415 | +2,927 | +8.02% |
| 2003 | 36,488 | +2,465 | +7.25% |
| 2002 | 34,023 | +2,326 | +7.34% |
| 2001 | 31,697 | +2,823 | +9.78% |
| 2000 | 28,874 | +2,197 | +8.24% |
| 1999 | 26,677 | +957 | +3.72% |
| 1998 | 25,720 | −12 | −0.05% |
| 1997 | 25,732 | +927 | +3.74% |
| 1996 | 24,805 | +1,034 | +4.35% |
| 1995 | 23,771 | −964 | −3.9% |
| 1994 | 24,735 | −1,720 | −6.5% |
| 1993 | 26,455 | −2,827 | −9.65% |
| 1992 | 29,282 | −1,895 | −6.08% |
| 1991 | 31,177 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
