Labor productivity in Georgia in 2025 — 55,920 $/person. Ranked 70 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 206.7%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Georgia
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 55,920 | +2,346 | +4.38% |
| 2024 | 53,574 | +3,066 | +6.07% |
| 2023 | 50,507 | +3,237 | +6.85% |
| 2022 | 47,271 | +2,681 | +6.01% |
| 2021 | 44,590 | +6,065 | +15.74% |
| 2020 | 38,525 | −2,740 | −6.64% |
| 2019 | 41,265 | +2,431 | +6.26% |
| 2018 | 38,835 | +2,908 | +8.1% |
| 2017 | 35,926 | +935 | +2.67% |
| 2016 | 34,991 | +1,433 | +4.27% |
| 2015 | 33,558 | +908 | +2.78% |
| 2014 | 32,650 | +686 | +2.14% |
| 2013 | 31,965 | +1,707 | +5.64% |
| 2012 | 30,257 | +2,273 | +8.12% |
| 2011 | 27,985 | +2,315 | +9.02% |
| 2010 | 25,670 | +1,739 | +7.27% |
| 2009 | 23,930 | +115 | +0.48% |
| 2008 | 23,815 | +1,891 | +8.63% |
| 2007 | 21,924 | +2,675 | +13.9% |
| 2006 | 19,249 | +1,801 | +10.32% |
| 2005 | 17,448 | +1,927 | +12.42% |
| 2004 | 15,521 | +1,151 | +8.01% |
| 2003 | 14,370 | +1,478 | +11.46% |
| 2002 | 12,892 | +981 | +8.24% |
| 2001 | 11,911 | +770 | +6.91% |
| 2000 | 11,141 | +13 | +0.12% |
| 1999 | 11,128 | +442 | +4.14% |
| 1998 | 10,686 | +943 | +9.68% |
| 1997 | 9,742 | +1,337 | +15.9% |
| 1996 | 8,405 | +1,550 | +22.61% |
| 1995 | 6,855 | +405 | +6.28% |
| 1994 | 6,450 | −540 | −7.72% |
| 1993 | 6,990 | −3,130 | −30.93% |
| 1992 | 10,119 | −8,116 | −44.51% |
| 1991 | 18,235 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
